2.1 sec in total
102 ms
1.3 sec
665 ms
Welcome to difference.site homepage info - get ready to check Difference best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about difference.site
Visit difference.siteWe analyzed Difference.site page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
difference.site performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value1,790 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
102 ms
430 ms
46 ms
69 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Difference.site, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (589 ms) belongs to the original domain Difference.site.
Page size can be reduced by 390.6 kB (16%)
2.5 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Difference.site main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Difference images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 168.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 168.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 116.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Difference.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 116.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (27%)
56
41
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Difference. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
difference.site
102 ms
www.difference.site
430 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
46 ms
styles.css
69 ms
css
24 ms
style.css
118 ms
font-awesome.min.css
93 ms
responsive.css
100 ms
css
36 ms
arpw-frontend.css
111 ms
social_icons_widget.css
96 ms
jquery.js
161 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
131 ms
picturefill.min.js
132 ms
jquery.form.min.js
130 ms
scripts.js
152 ms
bunyad-theme.js
155 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
227 ms
wp-embed.min.js
228 ms
connect.cgi
338 ms
diff-site-logo.png
308 ms
to-vs-too-359x201.jpg
307 ms
sram-vs-dram-359x201.jpg
309 ms
managers-vs-leaders-359x201.jpg
309 ms
ram-vs-rom-359x201.jpg
310 ms
hiv-vs-aids-359x201.jpg
311 ms
iPhone-4-s-359x201.jpg
312 ms
how-to-remember-then-vs-than1-359x201.jpg
309 ms
public-security-vs-private-security-359x201.jpg
311 ms
Flags-of-usa-and-canada-359x201.jpg
312 ms
pc-vs-mac-359x201.jpg
313 ms
ThisVsThatLogo-359x201.jpg
313 ms
data-vs-information-359x201.jpg
313 ms
coke-zero-vs-coke-diet-359x201.jpg
314 ms
could-vs-would-359x201.jpg
311 ms
LCD-Hintergrundbeleuchtung_mit_Edge-LEDs-359x201.jpg
311 ms
democrat-vs-socialist-359x201.jpg
314 ms
who-vs-whom-359x201.jpg
316 ms
college-vs-university-359x201.jpg
316 ms
highschool-vs-college-359x201.jpg
317 ms
uber-vs.-lyft-359x201.jpg
313 ms
usb-359x201.jpg
314 ms
speed-vs-velocity-359x201.jpg
314 ms
comparison-between-Unix-and-linux-359x201.jpg
317 ms
did.jpg
317 ms
did-have.jpg
342 ms
iphone-6-6S.jpg
345 ms
Sony-Xperia-Z-vs-Sony-Xperia-Z1.jpg
589 ms
facebook.jpg
317 ms
rss.jpg
316 ms
twitter.jpg
342 ms
pc-vs-mac.jpg
376 ms
to-vs-too.jpg
344 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
293 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
292 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
292 ms
speed-vs-velocity.jpg
374 ms
who-vs-whom.jpg
153 ms
highschool-vs-college.jpg
152 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
140 ms
democrat-vs-socialist.jpg
135 ms
hiv-vs-aids.jpg
179 ms
difference.site accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
difference.site best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
difference.site SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Difference.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Difference.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
difference.site
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Difference. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: