4.1 sec in total
337 ms
3.3 sec
501 ms
Click here to check amazing Digg content for Saudi Arabia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about digg.to
Use shorte.st link shortener to make money online. We pay for each visit to your short link.
Visit digg.toWe analyzed Digg.to page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
digg.to performance score
337 ms
511 ms
1070 ms
44 ms
1530 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Digg.to, 42% (14 requests) were made to Static.shorte.st and 15% (5 requests) were made to Themes.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Static.shorte.st.
Page size can be reduced by 532.5 kB (64%)
838.5 kB
306.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Digg.to main page is 838.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 404.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Digg needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 39% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 354.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digg.to needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 354.1 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (23%)
26
20
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
digg.to
337 ms
shorte.st
511 ms
smeweb.css
1070 ms
font-awesome.min.css
44 ms
smeweb.js
1530 ms
addthis_widget.js
56 ms
536a0f3c4c374ae3_bs.js
50 ms
mobile-logo.png
87 ms
menu-burger.png
175 ms
ninja-head-logo.png
288 ms
gaaks-logo.jpg
290 ms
testimonial-01.jpg
288 ms
testimonial-02.jpg
289 ms
sdk.js
250 ms
418 ms
xd_arbiter.php
576 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
379 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
379 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
421 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
485 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
486 ms
analytics.js
373 ms
sprite-fs8.png
410 ms
copy-bg.png
327 ms
right-arrow.png
302 ms
lng-sprite.png
327 ms
top-cta-bg.png
409 ms
sprite-icon-sand.png
408 ms
ruxitagent_2fnqrt_10089160218232444.js
76 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
30 ms
xd_arbiter.php
87 ms
nr-885.min.js
135 ms
digg.to SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digg.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Digg.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digg.to
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: