7.1 sec in total
932 ms
5.6 sec
499 ms
Welcome to digigraph.me homepage info - get ready to check Digigraph best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about digigraph.me
Visit digigraph.meWe analyzed Digigraph.me page load time and found that the first response time was 932 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
digigraph.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
69/100
10%
Value3.1 s
74/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
932 ms
505 ms
511 ms
508 ms
511 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Digigraph.me, 29% (31 requests) were made to 0 and 11% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Digigraph.me.
Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (39%)
7.2 MB
4.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Digigraph.me main page is 7.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Digigraph needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 423.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 423.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 527.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digigraph.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 527.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (51%)
86
42
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digigraph. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
digigraph.me
932 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
505 ms
style.css
511 ms
style.css
508 ms
styles.css
511 ms
settings.css
512 ms
uaf.css
516 ms
style.css
2249 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
2330 ms
style.css
2334 ms
shortcodes.css
2331 ms
popup-maker-site.min.css
2335 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
2335 ms
magnific_popup.css
2799 ms
digigraph.me
3476 ms
jquery.js
2944 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2920 ms
main.js
2921 ms
jquery.mobile.min.js
2924 ms
responsiveslides.js
3341 ms
main.js
3348 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
3403 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
3354 ms
clients.css
507 ms
clients.js
486 ms
font-awesome.min.css
3286 ms
css
16 ms
font-awesome.min.css
11 ms
box-shortcodes.css
3504 ms
animate.css
3506 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
3505 ms
jquery.form.min.js
3505 ms
scripts.js
3505 ms
custom.js
3621 ms
core.min.js
3624 ms
position.min.js
3623 ms
popup-maker-site.min.js
3626 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
3624 ms
waypoints.min.js
3622 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
3674 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
40 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
3697 ms
wp-embed.min.js
3258 ms
other-shortcodes.js
3269 ms
inview.js
3268 ms
DigiGraph-Logo3.png
178 ms
css
77 ms
bb9df112-1a38-4afa-9649-7f88bde8d621.jpg
1160 ms
HP1_Featured2_Ronda.jpg
1207 ms
HP1_Featured3_Nickelodeon.jpg
1180 ms
CallToAction.png
1196 ms
GatherInfo.png
1184 ms
PersonalRewards.png
1208 ms
usmnt.jpg
1169 ms
Mock-Ups.png
1166 ms
Call-To-Action.png
1162 ms
Engage_Icon.png
1163 ms
Gather_Info.png
1157 ms
Reward_Icon.png
1159 ms
DGWeb15_HOW2_Engage1.png
1173 ms
HOW_GatherInfo_Image.png
1194 ms
Rewards.png
1181 ms
Reward.png
1199 ms
Clients_49ers.png
1170 ms
Clients_FloridaBlue.png
1171 ms
Clients_LandOLakes.png
1177 ms
Clients_HM.png
1178 ms
Clients_CricketAUS.png
1173 ms
Clients_Viacom.png
1181 ms
Clients_Fox.png
1183 ms
logo-footer.png
1129 ms
BarryBerkowitz_CoFounder_CEO_Headshot2015_Sq-e1450307117567.png
1140 ms
TomSmart_CoFounder_COO_Headshot2015_Sq.png
1144 ms
CourtCampion_ProgramDirector_Headshot2015_Sq.png
1145 ms
MattHandy_ExecutiveVPTechnology_Headshot2015_Sq.png
1145 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
8 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
13 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
17 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
17 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
17 ms
151218091835Benton-Sans-Regular.woff
1128 ms
151206103022Festus.woff
1128 ms
151218091721Benton-Sans-Bold.woff
1134 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
1138 ms
SF_Client.png
1054 ms
Florida_Blue_Client.png
1058 ms
LandOLakes_Client.png
1059 ms
HM_Client.png
1059 ms
CricketAus_Client.png
1060 ms
Viacom_Client.png
1060 ms
Fox_Client.png
1064 ms
BarryBerkowitz_CoFounder_CEO_Headshot2015_Sq.png
1065 ms
US_Soccer_Federation.png
1049 ms
Digigraph-Header-Background-02-1.jpg
1054 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
48 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
49 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
27 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
28 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
27 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
47 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
47 ms
151218092803Designer-Block.woff
1020 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
45 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1032 ms
ssi-icomoon.woff
1026 ms
ajax-loader.gif
96 ms
revicons.woff
84 ms
digigraph.me accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
digigraph.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
digigraph.me SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digigraph.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Digigraph.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digigraph.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digigraph. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: