3.1 sec in total
212 ms
2.7 sec
222 ms
Visit digimouth.com now to see the best up-to-date Digimouth content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digimouth.com
A quirky and interesting take on the Digital Industry in India. Latest internet and mobile industry news, articles and analysis
Visit digimouth.comWe analyzed Digimouth.com page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
digimouth.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.088
92/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
212 ms
1661 ms
92 ms
140 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Digimouth.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Digimouth.com.
Page size can be reduced by 99.1 kB (22%)
444.4 kB
345.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Digimouth.com main page is 444.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 315.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digimouth images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 15.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digimouth.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (21%)
56
44
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digimouth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
digimouth.com
212 ms
www.digimouth.com
1661 ms
main.css
92 ms
menu.css
140 ms
easytabs.js
156 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
145 ms
common.css
178 ms
top-menu.css
179 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
logo.gif
120 ms
wyse-technology-logo.jpg
193 ms
redhat.png
315 ms
mashable_crowd_360x225.png
194 ms
instagram.jpg
194 ms
guest-column.jpg
191 ms
vidhyadhar_72.jpg
192 ms
working-cls-hero.jpg
204 ms
aditya-mid.jpg
202 ms
bloggers-park.jpg
248 ms
jammy-rajan-mid.jpg
268 ms
tete-a-tete.jpg
266 ms
karthik-nagarajan-72.jpg
268 ms
talking-title.jpg
272 ms
milind-modi-72.jpg
313 ms
in-com.jpg
331 ms
roadies.jpg
348 ms
oyy-its-friday.jpg
336 ms
wikipedia.jpg
345 ms
mobile-shopping.jpg
379 ms
smartphone-50.jpg
381 ms
pramati.jpg
396 ms
writing.jpg
401 ms
wap.jpg
409 ms
digiGuide.gif
433 ms
android-tablet-72.jpg
445 ms
article-and-analysis.jpg
443 ms
ca-pub-7593042141075333.js
168 ms
zrt_lookup.html
161 ms
show_ads_impl.js
89 ms
ga.js
31 ms
nav-arrow.gif
470 ms
diginews.gif
471 ms
redbull.gif
483 ms
on-hire-small.jpg
485 ms
rizwan-iqbal.jpg
486 ms
watch-web-2.jpg
486 ms
newsvine.gif
530 ms
case-studies.jpg
531 ms
case.jpg
574 ms
__utm.gif
79 ms
ads
244 ms
osd.js
9 ms
833661495640344064
34 ms
abg.js
36 ms
m_js_controller.js
49 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
33 ms
s
34 ms
x_button_blue2.png
33 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
6 ms
digimouth.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
digimouth.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
digimouth.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digimouth.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Digimouth.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digimouth.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digimouth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: