Tools & Wizards About Us
digital.computer screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

digital.computer

Learn to Start an eCommerce Business - digital.computer Learn to Start an eCommerce Business and best tools for your store

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

digital.computer screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Digital content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about digital.computer

digital.computer Learn to Start an eCommerce Business and best tools for your store

Visit digital.computer

Key Findings

We analyzed Digital.computer page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digital.computer performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

66/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digital.computer

71 ms

digital.computer

143 ms

js

100 ms

style.min.css

250 ms

style.css

256 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Digital.computer, 18% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Digital.computer.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 178.9 kB (24%)

Content Size

731.1 kB

After Optimization

552.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Digital.computer main page is 731.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 373.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 88.9 kB

  • Original 114.9 kB
  • After minification 103.2 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 373.3 kB
  • After minification 350.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 57.8 kB

  • Original 157.2 kB
  • After minification 157.2 kB
  • After compression 99.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.8 kB or 37% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 85.8 kB
  • After minification 85.8 kB
  • After compression 76.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digital.computer needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (66%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

digital.computer

digital.computer

71 ms

digital.computer

digital.computer

143 ms

js

js

100 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

250 ms

style.css

style.css

256 ms

style.css

style.css

1800 ms

css

css

36 ms

tds-front.css

tds-front.css

1797 ms

style.css

style.css

337 ms

td_legacy_main.css

td_legacy_main.css

312 ms

tdb_main.css

tdb_main.css

270 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

274 ms

devtools-detect.js

devtools-detect.js

296 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

317 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

319 ms

js

js

126 ms

tagdiv_theme.min.js

tagdiv_theme.min.js

349 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

335 ms

js_files_for_front.min.js

js_files_for_front.min.js

334 ms

js_files_for_front.min.js

js_files_for_front.min.js

348 ms

tdLoadingBox.js

tdLoadingBox.js

355 ms

tdLoginMobile.js

tdLoginMobile.js

355 ms

tdMenu.js

tdMenu.js

371 ms

tdAjaxSearch.js

tdAjaxSearch.js

369 ms

js

js

242 ms

s44MWHVilkuTZatqifEWRg_ZjD9GY_3MGh85oCRBSapE99IZ8JP0EZOpR-EUQ5bOXjXTRsj3GnLbe2IlNovs8jYmNSClY20iXOxEGX7EXSGpO2loUCm550rY34CVCyP5Iig_xvIp53ZPA8dpwr3QB0A1NuIehH20_A7AsI--V3u_KmANoq2VAuXu49qKHg

s44MWHVilkuTZatqifEWRg_ZjD9GY_3MGh85oCRBSapE99IZ8JP0EZOpR-EUQ5bOXjXTRsj3GnLbe2IlNovs8jYmNSClY20iXOxEGX7EXSGpO2loUCm550rY34CVCyP5Iig_xvIp53ZPA8dpwr3QB0A1NuIehH20_A7AsI--V3u_KmANoq2VAuXu49qKHg

316 ms

mobile-bg.jpg

mobile-bg.jpg

3539 ms

Amazon-Affiliate-WordPress.jpg

Amazon-Affiliate-WordPress.jpg

207 ms

Affiliate-Marketing.png

Affiliate-Marketing.png

209 ms

WordPress-Security.jpg

WordPress-Security.jpg

206 ms

to-make-your-WordPress-website-more-secure-.jpg

to-make-your-WordPress-website-more-secure-.jpg

206 ms

Monetize-Your-WordPress-Blog-1.png

Monetize-Your-WordPress-Blog-1.png

208 ms

Slow-WordPress.jpg

Slow-WordPress.jpg

271 ms

wordpress-Bugs.jpg

wordpress-Bugs.jpg

271 ms

2023-01-31-22_25_12-Window-1024x165.png

2023-01-31-22_25_12-Window-1024x165.png

268 ms

updraftplus.jpg

updraftplus.jpg

267 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

114 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

114 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

178 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

179 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

163 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

179 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

180 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

180 ms

newspaper.woff

newspaper.woff

68 ms

Accessibility Review

digital.computer accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

digital.computer best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

digital.computer SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digital.computer can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digital.computer main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

digital.computer

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: