Tools & Wizards About Us
digitalaquarius.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

digitalaquarius.com

Online Reviews - Tech - Laptops - DigitalAquarius.com

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

803 ms

Page Rendered

221 ms

digitalaquarius.com screenshot

About Website

Visit digitalaquarius.com now to see the best up-to-date Digital Aquarius content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digitalaquarius.com

We bring you the best products online in easy to navigate top 10 lists - our unbiased reviews will help you to make a better buying decision and save time.

Visit digitalaquarius.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Digitalaquarius.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digitalaquarius.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.13

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digitalaquarius.com

60 ms

digitalaquarius.com

130 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

12 ms

style.min.css

21 ms

styles.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Digitalaquarius.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) belongs to the original domain Digitalaquarius.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 94.4 kB (12%)

Content Size

774.4 kB

After Optimization

680.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Digitalaquarius.com main page is 774.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 545.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 56.3 kB

  • Original 69.0 kB
  • After minification 65.0 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 34.3 kB

  • Original 545.6 kB
  • After minification 511.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital Aquarius images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 93.4 kB
  • After minification 93.2 kB
  • After compression 91.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 66.3 kB
  • After minification 64.3 kB
  • After compression 64.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalaquarius.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (55%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Aquarius. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

digitalaquarius.com

digitalaquarius.com

60 ms

digitalaquarius.com

digitalaquarius.com

130 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

12 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

21 ms

styles.css

styles.css

83 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

79 ms

plugins.min.css

plugins.min.css

80 ms

icons.min.css

icons.min.css

27 ms

css

css

27 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

120 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

31 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

36 ms

core.css

core.css

38 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

48 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

47 ms

open_in_new_window_yes.js

open_in_new_window_yes.js

54 ms

open_in_new_window.js

open_in_new_window.js

56 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

64 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

69 ms

ajax.min.js

ajax.min.js

77 ms

shortcodes.min.js

shortcodes.min.js

84 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

267 ms

default-auth-scripts.min.js

default-auth-scripts.min.js

268 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

85 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

267 ms

Screen-Shot-2021-12-19-at-11.11.15-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2021-12-19-at-11.11.15-PM.png

85 ms

Screen-Shot-2021-11-27-at-9.45.21-PM-360x180.png

Screen-Shot-2021-11-27-at-9.45.21-PM-360x180.png

117 ms

Screen-Shot-2021-07-25-at-3.46.58-PM-360x180.png

Screen-Shot-2021-07-25-at-3.46.58-PM-360x180.png

145 ms

Screen-Shot-2021-07-23-at-10.55.03-PM-360x180.png

Screen-Shot-2021-07-23-at-10.55.03-PM-360x180.png

107 ms

Screen-Shot-2021-07-03-at-3.46.31-PM-360x180.png

Screen-Shot-2021-07-03-at-3.46.31-PM-360x180.png

123 ms

Screen-Shot-2021-04-25-at-2.53.28-PM-360x180.png

Screen-Shot-2021-04-25-at-2.53.28-PM-360x180.png

104 ms

Screenshot-11-360x180.png

Screenshot-11-360x180.png

188 ms

Screen-Shot-2020-06-06-at-2.32.42-PM-360x180.png

Screen-Shot-2020-06-06-at-2.32.42-PM-360x180.png

204 ms

Screen-Shot-2020-05-18-at-3.28.19-PM-360x180.png

Screen-Shot-2020-05-18-at-3.28.19-PM-360x180.png

222 ms

Screen-Shot-2021-11-27-at-4.52.56-PM-360x180.png

Screen-Shot-2021-11-27-at-4.52.56-PM-360x180.png

220 ms

Screen-Shot-2019-10-16-at-1.20.58-AM-360x180.png

Screen-Shot-2019-10-16-at-1.20.58-AM-360x180.png

257 ms

House-of-Marley-Smile-360x180.jpg

House-of-Marley-Smile-360x180.jpg

212 ms

Screen-Shot-2019-09-05-at-10.22.58-AM-360x180.png

Screen-Shot-2019-09-05-at-10.22.58-AM-360x180.png

304 ms

msi-360x180.png

msi-360x180.png

286 ms

Zagg-slim-book-go-360x180.jpg

Zagg-slim-book-go-360x180.jpg

293 ms

font

font

22 ms

ui-icomoon.ttf

ui-icomoon.ttf

316 ms

Accessibility Review

digitalaquarius.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

digitalaquarius.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

digitalaquarius.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalaquarius.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalaquarius.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

digitalaquarius.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digital Aquarius. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: