Access digitalbeauty.com. Front Row Blog | Insights, Press, Trends, and White Papers

19

Performance

Renders faster than
36% of other websites
75

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 41% of websites
83

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
55% of websites
83

SEO

Google-friendlier than
46% of websites

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

599 ms

Page Rendered

2.2 sec

About Website

Visit digitalbeauty.com now to see the best up-to-date Digitalbeauty content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digitalbeauty.com

Explore valuable insights, industry trends, press coverage, award recognition, and informative white papers on the Front Row blog. Stay informed and inspired in the world of commerce.

Visit digitalbeauty.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Digitalbeauty.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,270 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.6 s

0/100

10%

digitalbeauty.com

40 ms

119 ms

prismic.min.js

75 ms

entry.16b6837a.css

71 ms

FollowMouseLink.980c210a.css

178 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Digitalbeauty.com, 51% (42 requests) were made to Frontrow.cdn.prismic.io and 28% (23 requests) were made to Images.prismic.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (194 ms) relates to the external source Frontrowgroup.com.

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

683.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Digitalbeauty.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 554.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 500.2 kB

Original 554.9 kB
After minification 553.2 kB
After compression 54.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 500.2 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

Original 467.4 kB
After minification 465.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digitalbeauty images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 19 B

Original 156.6 kB
After minification 156.6 kB
After compression 156.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 96 B

Original 6.3 kB
After minification 6.3 kB
After compression 6.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalbeauty.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digitalbeauty. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalbeauty.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalbeauty.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

digitalbeauty.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digitalbeauty. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Front Row Blog | Insights, Press, Trends, and White Papers

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)