Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

digitalclippingpath.com

Digital Clipping Path Service provider for All Image Editing Services

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

174 ms

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

422 ms

digitalclippingpath.com screenshot

About Website

Visit digitalclippingpath.com now to see the best up-to-date Digital Clipping Path content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digitalclippingpath.com

Digital Clipping Path Company's Image & Photo Editing fees begin at $0.25 per image. Get a quote in less than 24 hours for clipping paths.

Visit digitalclippingpath.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Digitalclippingpath.com page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digitalclippingpath.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value970 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.134

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digitalclippingpath.com

174 ms

digitalclippingpath.com

567 ms

39f4dc1a2ab027b183e1e5f5b4fcc343.css

667 ms

jquery.min.js

337 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

208 ms

Our browser made a total of 203 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (167 requests) were addressed to the original Digitalclippingpath.com, 16% (33 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 0% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Digitalclippingpath.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 286.5 kB (73%)

Content Size

393.6 kB

After Optimization

107.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Digitalclippingpath.com main page is 393.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 326.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 286.5 kB

  • Original 326.9 kB
  • After minification 323.3 kB
  • After compression 40.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 286.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 66.7 kB
  • After minification 66.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital Clipping Path images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 155 (96%)

Requests Now

162

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 162 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Clipping Path. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 119 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

digitalclippingpath.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

digitalclippingpath.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

digitalclippingpath.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalclippingpath.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalclippingpath.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digital Clipping Path. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: