4.4 sec in total
166 ms
2.3 sec
1.9 sec
Click here to check amazing Digital Compare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about digitalcompare.co.uk
Compare mobile deals on phone contracts, SIM-only plans, and more, and take a look at CompareMyMobile's guides to choosing the right deal for you.
Visit digitalcompare.co.ukWe analyzed Digitalcompare.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 166 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
digitalcompare.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value6.5 s
38/100
10%
Value3,260 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
166 ms
760 ms
1212 ms
1455 ms
743 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Digitalcompare.co.uk, 14% (5 requests) were made to Comparemymobile.com and 14% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Img.cdndtl.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 346.6 kB (69%)
505.8 kB
159.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Digitalcompare.co.uk main page is 505.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 411.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 345.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 52.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 345.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 912 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital Compare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 137 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (31%)
32
22
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mobilephonechecker.co.uk
166 ms
760 ms
gtm.js
1212 ms
logo.svg
1455 ms
polyfill.min.js
743 ms
vendor.fb4459d717bd2bca4ad6.js
574 ms
common.4433dd2fe703d8ca86af.js
594 ms
mobile-home-page.812825e7d7666a87cfa6.js
667 ms
ssr-handsets-grid.509640ddaff23b4a380d.js
667 ms
cookie-policy-trigger.js
706 ms
phones-header.png
994 ms
sim-header.png
1006 ms
3.png
924 ms
EE.png
926 ms
O2.png
862 ms
vodafone.png
952 ms
BT-powered.png
953 ms
Giffgaff-powered.png
1171 ms
iD-powered-by-Three.png
1074 ms
Voxi-Logo.png
974 ms
apple.png
980 ms
samsung.png
1075 ms
huawei.png
1056 ms
google.png
1093 ms
oneplus.png
1154 ms
lg.png
1274 ms
sony.png
1237 ms
nokia.png
1158 ms
datadog-logs.js
207 ms
open-sans-v13-latin-700.woff
541 ms
open-sans-v13-latin-regular.woff
555 ms
analytics.js
83 ms
linkid.js
5 ms
ec.js
6 ms
collect
3 ms
collect
2 ms
digitalcompare.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
digitalcompare.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
digitalcompare.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalcompare.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalcompare.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digitalcompare.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digital Compare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: