Tools & Wizards About Us
digitaledroom.nl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

digitaledroom.nl

Interconnect Services - Uw datacenter- en cloudpartner

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

289 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

199 ms

digitaledroom.nl screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Digitaledroom content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about digitaledroom.nl

Datacenter- en Cloudspecialist. ✔ optimale betrouwbaarheid ✔ 2 datacenters (Tier III+) ✔ 6.800m2. Wij adviseren u graag: Tel. 073 88 000 00

Visit digitaledroom.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Digitaledroom.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 289 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digitaledroom.nl performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10,000 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.interconnect.nl

289 ms

www.interconnect.nl

426 ms

fczRDoMgDIXhF3LiHqliVQxQ0h5nePtlXMNumjb_ly4uZLB6yZk9nKFGdqsIDEplWv7mF05O3EfyxNmTym0cx6I9mDfe6Y7os6IM1HIKpA_a7KdEinDlfjx20WTT2x1Kn4DaTufN3G9TNsacQh4BSxTyCCjTVn0ks5FYVR5jbf0L.css

290 ms

font-awesome.min.css

18 ms

M9bPKixNLaoEAA.js

480 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Digitaledroom.nl, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Interconnect.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 599.9 kB (54%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

514.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Digitaledroom.nl main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 512.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 29.5 kB

  • Original 36.1 kB
  • After minification 28.2 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.9 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 142.6 kB

  • Original 512.3 kB
  • After minification 369.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Digitaledroom needs image optimization as it can save up to 142.6 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 164.7 kB

  • Original 256.2 kB
  • After minification 248.6 kB
  • After compression 91.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 164.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 263.1 kB

  • Original 309.9 kB
  • After minification 305.7 kB
  • After compression 46.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitaledroom.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 263.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (50%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digitaledroom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.interconnect.nl

www.interconnect.nl

289 ms

www.interconnect.nl

www.interconnect.nl

426 ms

fczRDoMgDIXhF3LiHqliVQxQ0h5nePtlXMNumjb_ly4uZLB6yZk9nKFGdqsIDEplWv7mF05O3EfyxNmTym0cx6I9mDfe6Y7os6IM1HIKpA_a7KdEinDlfjx20WTT2x1Kn4DaTufN3G9TNsacQh4BSxTyCCjTVn0ks5FYVR5jbf0L.css

fczRDoMgDIXhF3LiHqliVQxQ0h5nePtlXMNumjb_ly4uZLB6yZk9nKFGdqsIDEplWv7mF05O3EfyxNmTym0cx6I9mDfe6Y7os6IM1HIKpA_a7KdEinDlfjx20WTT2x1Kn4DaTufN3G9TNsacQh4BSxTyCCjTVn0ks5FYVR5jbf0L.css

290 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

18 ms

M9bPKixNLaoEAA.js

M9bPKixNLaoEAA.js

480 ms

hc7RDoIwDAXQHyIbftJoqmxA72yLZn8vhpj4gPLUNPf0pn3M4qwEESaPRpqrxwFwc001LFm6_tDgOQdKitV4_sPKfWVtYUg0bY3sNJ7jujlvdYTjHBMwZf5h9tFd4k3TI3u7QheLxT7HxSAH6ff-_uAF.js

hc7RDoIwDAXQHyIbftJoqmxA72yLZn8vhpj4gPLUNPf0pn3M4qwEESaPRpqrxwFwc001LFm6_tDgOQdKitV4_sPKfWVtYUg0bY3sNJ7jujlvdYTjHBMwZf5h9tFd4k3TI3u7QheLxT7HxSAH6ff-_uAF.js

587 ms

css

css

59 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

98 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

header_pattern.svg

header_pattern.svg

176 ms

logo-interconnect@2x.png

logo-interconnect@2x.png

230 ms

navbar-bottomline.png

navbar-bottomline.png

177 ms

zeskant.svg

zeskant.svg

297 ms

header_toolbar_background.svg

header_toolbar_background.svg

295 ms

cta-blue.svg

cta-blue.svg

327 ms

Enexis-logo.png

Enexis-logo.png

393 ms

Pacombi_blok.png

Pacombi_blok.png

393 ms

Cybox_blok.png

Cybox_blok.png

396 ms

Vodafone_blok.png

Vodafone_blok.png

397 ms

Oneilli_blok.png

Oneilli_blok.png

396 ms

Indicia_blok.png

Indicia_blok.png

421 ms

LKf8nhXsWg5ybwEGXk8UBQ.woff

LKf8nhXsWg5ybwEGXk8UBQ.woff

101 ms

0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

115 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

84 ms

lILlYDvubYemzYzN7GbLkHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

lILlYDvubYemzYzN7GbLkHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

116 ms

PIPMHY90P7jtyjpXuZ2cLD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

PIPMHY90P7jtyjpXuZ2cLD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

114 ms

interconnect-icons.woff

interconnect-icons.woff

428 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

184 ms

cta-carousel.svg

cta-carousel.svg

343 ms

cta-white.svg

cta-white.svg

344 ms

Homepage_datacenter_def-e1432295260658.png

Homepage_datacenter_def-e1432295260658.png

1185 ms

timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js

timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js

37 ms

syndication

syndication

98 ms

604177340839694336

604177340839694336

106 ms

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

31 ms

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

66 ms

qjg54A5U_normal.png

qjg54A5U_normal.png

37 ms

CdvQi1iWIAAWWNq.jpg:small

CdvQi1iWIAAWWNq.jpg:small

38 ms

jot

jot

26 ms

Accessibility Review

digitaledroom.nl accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

digitaledroom.nl best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

digitaledroom.nl SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitaledroom.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitaledroom.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

digitaledroom.nl

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digitaledroom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: