Tools & Wizards About Us
digitalfutureofwork.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

digitalfutureofwork.com

MGI-NYU Digital Future of Work Summit: April 28, 2017

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

173 ms

Resources Loaded

850 ms

Page Rendered

899 ms

digitalfutureofwork.com screenshot

About Website

Visit digitalfutureofwork.com now to see the best up-to-date Digital Future Of Work content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digitalfutureofwork.com

On Friday, April 28th, 2017, the McKinsey Global Institute and New York University’s Stern School of Business will host their first

Visit digitalfutureofwork.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Digitalfutureofwork.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digitalfutureofwork.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digitalfutureofwork.com

173 ms

css

71 ms

bootstrap.min.css

100 ms

style.css

71 ms

mckinsey-logo.png

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Digitalfutureofwork.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (615 ms) belongs to the original domain Digitalfutureofwork.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 368.9 kB (9%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Digitalfutureofwork.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 68.0 kB

  • Original 91.0 kB
  • After minification 79.7 kB
  • After compression 23.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 93.8 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital Future Of Work images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 96.8 kB

  • Original 223.4 kB
  • After minification 222.2 kB
  • After compression 126.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.8 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 110.4 kB

  • Original 131.9 kB
  • After minification 128.8 kB
  • After compression 21.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalfutureofwork.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (7%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

38

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Future Of Work. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

digitalfutureofwork.com

digitalfutureofwork.com

173 ms

css

css

71 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

100 ms

style.css

style.css

71 ms

mckinsey-logo.png

mckinsey-logo.png

63 ms

nyu-logo2.jpg

nyu-logo2.jpg

77 ms

menu.png

menu.png

77 ms

new-background5.jpg

new-background5.jpg

201 ms

ABlue2.jpg

ABlue2.jpg

223 ms

CCamden2.jpg

CCamden2.jpg

147 ms

MChui2.jpg

MChui2.jpg

154 ms

vdhar2.jpg

vdhar2.jpg

135 ms

RFaroohar2.jpg

RFaroohar2.jpg

183 ms

DFarrell2.jpg

DFarrell2.jpg

201 ms

KFleming2.jpg

KFleming2.jpg

280 ms

JFox.jpg

JFox.jpg

199 ms

KGeorge.jpg

KGeorge.jpg

280 ms

AGlen.jpg

AGlen.jpg

281 ms

PHenry.jpg

PHenry.jpg

281 ms

SHorowitz2.jpg

SHorowitz2.jpg

292 ms

RKelly.jpg

RKelly.jpg

364 ms

SLund2.png

SLund2.png

363 ms

SKasriel2.jpg

SKasriel2.jpg

357 ms

DKirkpatrick2.jpg

DKirkpatrick2.jpg

370 ms

MMourshed2.jpg

MMourshed2.jpg

334 ms

EPorter.jpg

EPorter.jpg

371 ms

MRosenbaum2.jpg

MRosenbaum2.jpg

416 ms

JShapiro.jpg

JShapiro.jpg

366 ms

TSiebel2.jpg

TSiebel2.jpg

415 ms

AMSlaughter2.jpg

AMSlaughter2.jpg

442 ms

ASundararajan2.jpg

ASundararajan2.jpg

448 ms

STambe2.jpg

STambe2.jpg

464 ms

DTeran.jpg

DTeran.jpg

462 ms

JWald2.png

JWald2.png

569 ms

AWenger.jpg

AWenger.jpg

480 ms

LWilliams.jpg

LWilliams.jpg

593 ms

SZahidi2.jpg

SZahidi2.jpg

520 ms

js

js

111 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

615 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

451 ms

main.js

main.js

526 ms

absurdidad.png

absurdidad.png

410 ms

Accessibility Review

digitalfutureofwork.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

digitalfutureofwork.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

digitalfutureofwork.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalfutureofwork.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalfutureofwork.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

digitalfutureofwork.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digital Future Of Work. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: