Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

825 ms in total

First Response

114 ms

Resources Loaded

522 ms

Page Rendered

189 ms

digitall.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Digitall content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about digitall.co

Visit digitall.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Digitall.co page load time and found that the first response time was 114 ms and then it took 711 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digitall.co performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digitallmena.com

114 ms

style.css

33 ms

jquery.js

60 ms

jquery.validate.js

64 ms

analytics.js

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Digitall.co, 13% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (205 ms) relates to the external source Digitallmena.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 324.2 kB (54%)

Content Size

596.8 kB

After Optimization

272.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Digitall.co main page is 596.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 378.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 5.0 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 970 B, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 201.0 kB
  • After minification 197.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digitall images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 307.9 kB

  • Original 378.9 kB
  • After minification 230.5 kB
  • After compression 71.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 307.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 11.7 kB
  • After minification 9.2 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitall.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (23%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digitall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

digitall.co accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

digitall.co best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

digitall.co SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitall.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitall.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digitall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: