Tools & Wizards About Us
digitalliving.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

digitalliving.com

Trusted Smart Home & Technology Solutions | Digital Living

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

632 ms

digitalliving.com screenshot

About Website

Visit digitalliving.com now to see the best up-to-date Digital Living content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digitalliving.com

Digital Living - Trusted smart home & technology engineering providing home automation, audio-video, security, and networking solutions in Sonoma, Napa, Marin and Sacramento regions.

Visit digitalliving.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Digitalliving.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digitalliving.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.074

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digitallivingpro.com

77 ms

css

27 ms

grid.css

46 ms

base.css

56 ms

layout.css

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Digitalliving.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Homeadvisor.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (753 ms) relates to the external source Homeadvisor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (51%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Digitalliving.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 733.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 47.3 kB

  • Original 59.2 kB
  • After minification 57.6 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 715.9 kB
  • After minification 700.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital Living images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 379.4 kB

  • Original 569.3 kB
  • After minification 567.6 kB
  • After compression 189.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 379.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 622.3 kB

  • Original 733.6 kB
  • After minification 660.1 kB
  • After compression 111.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalliving.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 622.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (54%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Living. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

digitallivingpro.com

digitallivingpro.com

77 ms

css

css

27 ms

grid.css

grid.css

46 ms

base.css

base.css

56 ms

layout.css

layout.css

75 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

85 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

52 ms

mediaelementplayer.css

mediaelementplayer.css

57 ms

enfold.css

enfold.css

63 ms

custom.css

custom.css

97 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

97 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

99 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

127 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

107 ms

avia-compat.js

avia-compat.js

109 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

155 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

154 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

152 ms

avia.js

avia.js

326 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

349 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

347 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

353 ms

wp-mediaelement.js

wp-mediaelement.js

349 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

350 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

314 ms

ha-logo-title.png

ha-logo-title.png

126 ms

753 ms

Digital-Living-Logo-no-back.png

Digital-Living-Logo-no-back.png

273 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

271 ms

boha-2015.jpg

boha-2015.jpg

271 ms

DigLiv-Install-1200x630.jpg

DigLiv-Install-1200x630.jpg

407 ms

12855.jpg

12855.jpg

270 ms

5-Stars.png

5-Stars.png

270 ms

5646546.jpg

5646546.jpg

406 ms

12833.jpg

12833.jpg

407 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

407 ms

Digital-Living-Home-Theater-Pros.jpg

Digital-Living-Home-Theater-Pros.jpg

420 ms

community.jpg

community.jpg

407 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

150 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

151 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

299 ms

skin.css

skin.css

259 ms

xHxvdKO2b_U

xHxvdKO2b_U

93 ms

print.css

print.css

35 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

33 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

62 ms

xHxvdKO2b_U

xHxvdKO2b_U

34 ms

maxresdefault.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

26 ms

DigLiv-Install.jpg

DigLiv-Install.jpg

172 ms

2014-Winner.jpg

2014-Winner.jpg

49 ms

skin.png

skin.png

36 ms

stars.png

stars.png

14 ms

stars_medium.png

stars_medium.png

16 ms

Accessibility Review

digitalliving.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

digitalliving.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

digitalliving.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalliving.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalliving.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

digitalliving.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digital Living. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: