6.5 sec in total
1.5 sec
3.2 sec
1.8 sec
Click here to check amazing Digital Lynchpin content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about digitallynchpin.com
Digital Marketing Agency that develops, designs, and builds all things digital. Innovation driven and committed to best practice.
Visit digitallynchpin.comWe analyzed Digitallynchpin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
digitallynchpin.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value1,340 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
1478 ms
110 ms
304 ms
303 ms
104 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Digitallynchpin.com, 87% (55 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Digitallynchpin.com.
Page size can be reduced by 408.6 kB (71%)
573.0 kB
164.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Digitallynchpin.com main page is 573.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 468.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 364.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 364.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (92%)
59
5
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Lynchpin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.digitallynchpin.com
1478 ms
minified.js
110 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
304 ms
polyfill.min.js
303 ms
bootstrap-features.ad0b8e91.chunk.min.js
104 ms
main.5fb2863d.chunk.min.js
384 ms
lodash.min.js
383 ms
wix-code-sdk-providers.09067b9c.chunk.min.js
387 ms
passwordProtectedPage.2289057f.chunk.min.js
385 ms
protectedPages.e58e1f1b.chunk.min.js
386 ms
siteMembers.9d68d984.chunk.min.js
379 ms
siteScrollBlocker.f54f1ff5.chunk.min.js
391 ms
tpaCommons.a3ca3f04.chunk.min.js
394 ms
windowMessageRegistrar.cf976736.chunk.min.js
391 ms
platform.e2a5122e.chunk.min.js
390 ms
vendors~vendor-react-dom.be7a0676.chunk.min.js
395 ms
vendor-react-dom.6e25e583.chunk.min.js
391 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
393 ms
bolt-performance
777 ms
dynamicmodel
532 ms
clientWorker.257fff2b.bundle.min.js
727 ms
bt
731 ms
bundle.min.js
433 ms
custom-elements-polyfill.b198518f.chunk.min.js
294 ms
intersection-observer-polyfill.b9f1df8d.chunk.min.js
294 ms
thunderboltElements.aec83a90.bundle.min.js
299 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
294 ms
activePopup.b8dae737.chunk.min.js
292 ms
dropdownMenu.a248d6d3.chunk.min.js
292 ms
scrollRestoration.9c233b08.chunk.min.js
294 ms
backgroundScrub.4f3655c5.chunk.min.js
319 ms
imageZoom.0bea891c.chunk.min.js
296 ms
navigation.9d95d39e.chunk.min.js
296 ms
onloadCompsBehaviors.d1e3477f.chunk.min.js
318 ms
ooiTpaSharedConfig.4fd95bba.chunk.min.js
319 ms
pageAnchors.d228e04f.chunk.min.js
324 ms
pageScroll.a92f7a43.chunk.min.js
320 ms
pageTransitions.6398bab5.chunk.min.js
320 ms
platformPubsub.29c5e65d.chunk.min.js
308 ms
screenIn.f98e5389.chunk.min.js
308 ms
scrollToAnchor.3d779f03.chunk.min.js
308 ms
tpa.bc26409f.chunk.min.js
314 ms
verticalMenu.d5ee9763.chunk.min.js
308 ms
windowScroll.8e8b16ec.chunk.min.js
310 ms
bootstrap-components.8fe80c07.chunk.min.js
312 ms
HeaderContainer_BevelScreen.347477fe.chunk.min.js
310 ms
DropDownMenu.4ad909da.chunk.min.js
353 ms
DropDownMenu_OverlineMenuButtonSkin.27d27f1a.chunk.min.js
352 ms
PageGroup.76349271.chunk.min.js
351 ms
FiveGridLine.493417b1.chunk.min.js
344 ms
VerticalAnchorsMenu_VerticalAnchorsMenuSymbolWithHiddenTextSkin.b5c1616c.chunk.min.js
351 ms
Collage.ae41aa7d.chunk.min.js
347 ms
AppWidget.a65c12fb.chunk.min.js
347 ms
FormContainer_FormContainerSkin.84fa3dde.chunk.min.js
347 ms
common-site-members-dialogs.25cf4993.chunk.min.js
347 ms
TextInput.cfdea122.chunk.min.js
345 ms
TextAreaInput.bf3029ac.chunk.min.js
349 ms
PinnedLayer.59c08380.chunk.min.js
348 ms
lodash.min.js
339 ms
bt
46 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
65 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
180 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
65 ms
digitallynchpin.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
digitallynchpin.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
digitallynchpin.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitallynchpin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitallynchpin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digitallynchpin.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: