3.5 sec in total
659 ms
2.6 sec
241 ms
Visit digitalpost.com now to see the best up-to-date Digital Post content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digitalpost.com
Visit digitalpost.comWe analyzed Digitalpost.com page load time and found that the first response time was 659 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
digitalpost.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.2 s
1/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.28
43/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
659 ms
114 ms
135 ms
27 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Digitalpost.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (659 ms) belongs to the original domain Digitalpost.com.
Page size can be reduced by 518.4 kB (33%)
1.5 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Digitalpost.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 904.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital Post images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 247.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 247.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 214.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalpost.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 214.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (48%)
60
31
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Post. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.digitalpost.com
659 ms
style.css
114 ms
media.css
135 ms
css
27 ms
wp-customer-reviews.css
119 ms
layerslider.css
155 ms
all-skins.css
255 ms
flexslider.css
191 ms
style.css
168 ms
jquery.js
383 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
208 ms
wp-customer-reviews.js
199 ms
jtwt.js
227 ms
jquery.elastislide.js
242 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
288 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
283 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
304 ms
jquery.cycle.lite.js
291 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
299 ms
modernizr.js
328 ms
main.js
343 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery-min.js
356 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
346 ms
flowplayer.min.js
386 ms
style-1.css
462 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
418 ms
style.css
309 ms
all.css
99 ms
prettyPhoto.css
41 ms
flexslider.css
52 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
77 ms
ga.js
28 ms
digitalpostinc_wtele_logo.png
64 ms
shadow-top.png
51 ms
01video_topmic.png
86 ms
02video_camera.png
143 ms
03video_rlight.png
93 ms
04video_llight.png
141 ms
laptop_precision.png
243 ms
ipad_precision.png
198 ms
iphone_precision.png
137 ms
seo01_graphwarrow.png
243 ms
seo02_facebook.png
189 ms
seo02_twitter.png
202 ms
seo03_youtube.png
327 ms
shadow-bottom.png
327 ms
homepage_fallback_web.jpg
363 ms
hdvideoproduction.jpg
327 ms
feature2.jpg
362 ms
feature1.jpg
511 ms
shortcode_sep.png
328 ms
tab-bg.png
362 ms
iphone2013_mobiledesign.jpg
387 ms
iphone2013_click2call.jpg
397 ms
iphone2013_mobiledirections.jpg
400 ms
bg-title.gif
398 ms
arrow-bullet.png
391 ms
happy_clients.jpg
437 ms
UFoEz2uiuMypUGZL1NKoeg.ttf
20 ms
F51BEgHuR0tYHxF0bD4vwvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
132 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
collect
58 ms
skin.css
517 ms
ls_prev.png
89 ms
ls_next.png
91 ms
Museo_Slab_500-webfont.woff
97 ms
digitalpost.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
digitalpost.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
digitalpost.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalpost.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalpost.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digitalpost.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digital Post. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: