Tools & Wizards About Us
digitalweb.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

digitalweb.in

Web design company, Web Developer, Printing, Corporate Presentation and Mobile Apps developments in Delhi| Digitalweb.in

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

512 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

592 ms

digitalweb.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to digitalweb.in homepage info - get ready to check Digitalweb best content right away, or after learning these important things about digitalweb.in

Digitalweb offers Total Business Solution for your website designing, Printing, Corporate Presentation and Apps developments | Premium quality | Economical cost.

Visit digitalweb.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Digitalweb.in page load time and found that the first response time was 512 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digitalweb.in performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.768

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digitalweb.in

512 ms

generate_js:true

111 ms

js

72 ms

animate.min.css

259 ms

jquery.smallipop.css

465 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Digitalweb.in, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Digitalweb.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 156.3 kB (7%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Digitalweb.in main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 32.7 kB

  • Original 41.5 kB
  • After minification 34.1 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 66.4 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digitalweb images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 50.1 kB

  • Original 172.4 kB
  • After minification 172.4 kB
  • After compression 122.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 50.1 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 38.2 kB
  • After minification 37.9 kB
  • After compression 31.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalweb.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (53%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digitalweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

digitalweb.in

digitalweb.in

512 ms

generate_js:true

generate_js:true

111 ms

js

js

72 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

259 ms

jquery.smallipop.css

jquery.smallipop.css

465 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

474 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

485 ms

fgx-foundation.css

fgx-foundation.css

480 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

492 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

511 ms

css

css

30 ms

css

css

42 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

953 ms

custom.modernizr.js

custom.modernizr.js

708 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.0-packed.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.0-packed.js

729 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

726 ms

jquery.jtweetsanywhere-1.3.1.min.js

jquery.jtweetsanywhere-1.3.1.min.js

724 ms

app-head-calls.js

app-head-calls.js

753 ms

jflickrfeed.min.js

jflickrfeed.min.js

950 ms

setup.js

setup.js

981 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

983 ms

jquery.quicksand.js

jquery.quicksand.js

982 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

1009 ms

prettify.js

prettify.js

1186 ms

jquery.smallipop.js

jquery.smallipop.js

1182 ms

smallipop.calls.js

smallipop.calls.js

1212 ms

app-bottom-calls.js

app-bottom-calls.js

1302 ms

background5.jpg

background5.jpg

1298 ms

logo.png

logo.png

337 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

670 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

676 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

1185 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

1033 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

1059 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

914 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

915 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

1146 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

1621 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

1989 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

1543 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

1839 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

1666 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

2727 ms

14.jpg

14.jpg

2021 ms

background4.jpg

background4.jpg

1844 ms

body_shadow.png

body_shadow.png

1892 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

88 ms

zepto.js

zepto.js

1972 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

9 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2074 ms

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhDuXMQg.ttf

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhDuXMQg.ttf

21 ms

153682437

153682437

117 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

18 ms

554035377-dc923867969ad9454faebf30ef26c43369f6edf2e3bfc4a7d418c6971f7167e1-d

554035377-dc923867969ad9454faebf30ef26c43369f6edf2e3bfc4a7d418c6971f7167e1-d

260 ms

http://:0/

http://:0/

88 ms

icon_top.png

icon_top.png

255 ms

116 ms

Accessibility Review

digitalweb.in accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

digitalweb.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

digitalweb.in SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalweb.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalweb.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

digitalweb.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digitalweb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: