Tools & Wizards About Us
digitest.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

digitest.net

Webdesign & Webentwicklung in Freiburg, Joomla Spezialist, Webseitengestaltung, SEO Analyse, SEA Suchmaschinenmarketing, CMS und Responsive Template D...

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

369 ms

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

250 ms

digitest.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to digitest.net homepage info - get ready to check Digitest best content for Italy right away, or after learning these important things about digitest.net

Joomla 4 und 5, Webseiten, Responsive Design Templates und Joomla Spezialist, Shopware, WordPress. Programmierung, Anpassung und Inhaltsverwaltung Ihrer CMS. Suchmaschinen und Performances Optimierung...

Visit digitest.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Digitest.net page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digitest.net performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.11

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digitest.net

369 ms

www.digitest.net

2629 ms

style.css

218 ms

style.css

224 ms

mootools-core.js

549 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Digitest.net, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Digitest.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 305.6 kB (64%)

Content Size

476.3 kB

After Optimization

170.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Digitest.net main page is 476.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 370.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 23.2 kB

  • Original 28.4 kB
  • After minification 22.8 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 55.4 kB
  • After minification 42.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Digitest needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 251.5 kB

  • Original 370.8 kB
  • After minification 362.8 kB
  • After compression 119.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 251.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 17.7 kB

  • Original 21.6 kB
  • After minification 14.4 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitest.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (24%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

45

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digitest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

digitest.net

digitest.net

369 ms

www.digitest.net

www.digitest.net

2629 ms

style.css

style.css

218 ms

style.css

style.css

224 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

549 ms

core.js

core.js

224 ms

caption.js

caption.js

225 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

880 ms

powertools-1.2.0.js

powertools-1.2.0.js

330 ms

slider.js

slider.js

336 ms

system.css

system.css

346 ms

layout.css

layout.css

460 ms

css

css

25 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

6 ms

simpletooltip.min.js

simpletooltip.min.js

446 ms

simpletooltip.min.css

simpletooltip.min.css

449 ms

system.css

system.css

120 ms

logo.png

logo.png

225 ms

bild_05.jpg

bild_05.jpg

445 ms

bild_01b.jpg

bild_01b.jpg

454 ms

bild_02.jpg

bild_02.jpg

677 ms

bild_03.jpg

bild_03.jpg

666 ms

bild_04.jpg

bild_04.jpg

252 ms

prev.png

prev.png

344 ms

next.png

next.png

369 ms

play.png

play.png

465 ms

pause.png

pause.png

484 ms

test_optimierung_mobilgerte.jpg

test_optimierung_mobilgerte.jpg

684 ms

web_camilli.jpg

web_camilli.jpg

698 ms

web_cnrdaa.jpg

web_cnrdaa.jpg

1145 ms

web_contimbre.jpg

web_contimbre.jpg

612 ms

web_deplazio.jpg

web_deplazio.jpg

846 ms

web_devalounge.jpg

web_devalounge.jpg

1003 ms

web_fcfidene.jpg

web_fcfidene.jpg

909 ms

web_fipavlazio.jpg

web_fipavlazio.jpg

928 ms

web_hasenfuss.jpg

web_hasenfuss.jpg

933 ms

web_mfteknostudio.jpg

web_mfteknostudio.jpg

970 ms

web_morawe.jpg

web_morawe.jpg

1038 ms

web_park4dogs.jpg

web_park4dogs.jpg

1161 ms

web_pianetascienza.jpg

web_pianetascienza.jpg

1178 ms

web_probrake.jpg

web_probrake.jpg

1108 ms

web_renault.jpg

web_renault.jpg

1138 ms

web_snalearning.jpg

web_snalearning.jpg

1411 ms

web_spielraum.jpg

web_spielraum.jpg

1351 ms

web_villaaugusta.jpg

web_villaaugusta.jpg

1393 ms

web_vinicioferri.jpg

web_vinicioferri.jpg

1807 ms

web_wenches.jpg

web_wenches.jpg

1328 ms

delicious.png

delicious.png

1340 ms

digg.png

digg.png

1456 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

1463 ms

google.png

google.png

1489 ms

stumbleupon.png

stumbleupon.png

1520 ms

ga.js

ga.js

31 ms

technorati.png

technorati.png

1506 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

15 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

15 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

16 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

1367 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

1339 ms

bkg_body.png

bkg_body.png

1282 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

1285 ms

items_separator.png

items_separator.png

1225 ms

footer_block_separator.png

footer_block_separator.png

1274 ms

Accessibility Review

digitest.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

digitest.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

digitest.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitest.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitest.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

digitest.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digitest. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: