Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

digwow.com

Log into Facebook

Page Load Speed

22.1 sec in total

First Response

442 ms

Resources Loaded

19 sec

Page Rendered

2.7 sec

digwow.com screenshot

About Website

Visit digwow.com now to see the best up-to-date Digwow content for Taiwan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digwow.com

Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.

Visit digwow.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Digwow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 442 ms and then it took 21.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digwow.com performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,920 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.413

24/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digwow.com

442 ms

www.digwow.com

1334 ms

digWow-cdn.css

828 ms

prototype-1.6.0.3.js

1057 ms

scriptaculous.js

430 ms

Our browser made a total of 267 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Digwow.com, 38% (101 requests) were made to Dwimages.digwowimg.com and 28% (75 requests) were made to Dws1.digwowimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) relates to the external source Dwimages.digwowimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (13%)

Content Size

8.0 MB

After Optimization

7.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Digwow.com main page is 8.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 174.4 kB

  • Original 201.4 kB
  • After minification 163.0 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 38.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 174.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 395.1 kB

  • Original 7.3 MB
  • After minification 6.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digwow images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 356.3 kB

  • Original 449.4 kB
  • After minification 320.3 kB
  • After compression 93.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 356.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 99.1 kB

  • Original 115.3 kB
  • After minification 82.9 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digwow.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 99.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (27%)

Requests Now

255

After Optimization

186

The browser has sent 255 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digwow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

digwow.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

digwow.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

digwow.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digwow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digwow.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digwow. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: