Tools & Wizards About Us
dillow-taylor.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

dillow-taylor.com

Dillow-Taylor Funeral Home & Cremation Services, Inc.

Page Load Speed

531 ms in total

First Response

73 ms

Resources Loaded

316 ms

Page Rendered

142 ms

dillow-taylor.com screenshot

About Website

Visit dillow-taylor.com now to see the best up-to-date Dillow Taylor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dillow-taylor.com

Welcome to Dillow-Taylor Funeral Home and Cremation Services - Jonesborough, Tennessee

Visit dillow-taylor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dillow-taylor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 458 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dillow-taylor.com performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dillow-taylor.com

73 ms

dillow-taylor.com

84 ms

normalize.css

22 ms

skeleton.css

41 ms

css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Dillow-taylor.com, 17% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (84 ms) belongs to the original domain Dillow-taylor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.7 kB (6%)

Content Size

90.5 kB

After Optimization

84.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dillow-taylor.com main page is 90.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 49.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 60% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 49.7 kB
  • After minification 49.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dillow Taylor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 30.3 kB
  • After minification 30.3 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 6.1 kB
  • After minification 5.5 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dillow-taylor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 50% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dillow Taylor. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

dillow-taylor.com

dillow-taylor.com

73 ms

dillow-taylor.com

dillow-taylor.com

84 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

22 ms

skeleton.css

skeleton.css

41 ms

css

css

48 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

48 ms

logo.png

logo.png

57 ms

displaybinaryimage.php

displaybinaryimage.php

81 ms

YouTube.png

YouTube.png

55 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

81 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

24 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

29 ms

Accessibility Review

dillow-taylor.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

dillow-taylor.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

dillow-taylor.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dillow-taylor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dillow-taylor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dillow-taylor.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dillow Taylor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: