Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

diningroomdid.com

Dining Room Did – Dining Room Decorating!

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

108 ms

diningroomdid.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Dining Room Did content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about diningroomdid.com

Dining Room Decorating!

Visit diningroomdid.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Diningroomdid.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

diningroomdid.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

diningroomdid.com

51 ms

diningroomdid.com

475 ms

www.diningroomdid.com

478 ms

static.js

507 ms

batit.aliyun.com

1267 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Diningroomdid.com, 21% (3 requests) were made to Batit.aliyun.com and 21% (3 requests) were made to G.alicdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Zz.bdstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 kB (4%)

Content Size

29.6 kB

After Optimization

28.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Diningroomdid.com main page is 29.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 19.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 995 B

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 995 B or 48% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 7.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 250 B

  • Original 19.6 kB
  • After minification 19.6 kB
  • After compression 19.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 46 B

  • Original 430 B
  • After minification 430 B
  • After compression 384 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Diningroomdid.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46 B or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (55%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dining Room Did. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

diningroomdid.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

diningroomdid.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

diningroomdid.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Diningroomdid.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Chinese language. Our system also found out that Diningroomdid.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dining Room Did. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: