Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

dipacol.com

Imágenes y dibujos infantiles gratuitos para colorear, con dibujos animados, muñecos y otros personajes.

Page Load Speed

14 sec in total

First Response

756 ms

Resources Loaded

12.4 sec

Page Rendered

829 ms

dipacol.com screenshot

About Website

Visit dipacol.com now to see the best up-to-date Dipacol content for Mexico and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dipacol.com

En nuestro sitio, se pueden descargar gratis, imágenes divertidas y dibujos infantiles gratuitos para colorear con personajes preferidos de dibujos animados y otros personajes infantiles, preferidos.

Visit dipacol.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dipacol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 756 ms and then it took 13.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dipacol.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.24

52/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dipacol.com

756 ms

tablica.css

299 ms

jQuery.js

898 ms

adsbygoogle.js

89 ms

adsbygoogle.js

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 210 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (206 requests) were addressed to the original Dipacol.com, 1% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Dipacol.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 68.1 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Dipacol.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 55.6 kB

  • Original 66.5 kB
  • After minification 66.3 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dipacol images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 28.6 kB
  • After minification 28.6 kB
  • After compression 24.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 164 B

  • Original 864 B
  • After minification 864 B
  • After compression 700 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dipacol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164 B or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

208

After Optimization

208

The browser has sent 208 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dipacol. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

dipacol.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

dipacol.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

dipacol.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dipacol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Dipacol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dipacol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: