Tools & Wizards About Us
dipcraft.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

dipcraft.com

Fiberglass panels and fiberglass sheets for any project |Dipcraft

Page Load Speed

799 ms in total

First Response

69 ms

Resources Loaded

539 ms

Page Rendered

191 ms

dipcraft.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Dipcraft content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dipcraft.com

Our fiberglass panels inventory includes fiberglass roofing, fiberglass wall panels, skylight panels, fiberglass sheets, and other corrugated plastic.

Visit dipcraft.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dipcraft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 69 ms and then it took 730 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dipcraft.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dipcraft.com

69 ms

dipcraft.com

91 ms

bootstrap.min.css

66 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

71 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Dipcraft.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (164 ms) relates to the external source Gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 305.9 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

883.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dipcraft.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 712.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 15.3 kB

  • Original 19.4 kB
  • After minification 15.8 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.6 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 712.4 kB
  • After minification 709.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dipcraft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 143.3 kB

  • Original 285.5 kB
  • After minification 251.1 kB
  • After compression 142.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 143.3 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 144.0 kB

  • Original 171.7 kB
  • After minification 165.1 kB
  • After compression 27.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dipcraft.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 144.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (55%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dipcraft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dipcraft.com

dipcraft.com

69 ms

dipcraft.com

dipcraft.com

91 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

66 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

71 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

56 ms

style.css

style.css

72 ms

slick.css

slick.css

54 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

54 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

70 ms

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

32 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

39 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

69 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

57 ms

jquery-2.2.0.min.js

jquery-2.2.0.min.js

35 ms

slick.js

slick.js

84 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

65 ms

script.js

script.js

67 ms

css

css

29 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

151 ms

loader.js

loader.js

164 ms

Dipcraft-fiberglass-panels-logo_300.png

Dipcraft-fiberglass-panels-logo_300.png

140 ms

dipcraft-home-banner2.jpg

dipcraft-home-banner2.jpg

110 ms

Curved-fiberglass-furniture-panel.jpg

Curved-fiberglass-furniture-panel.jpg

46 ms

Interior-view-garden-center.jpg

Interior-view-garden-center.jpg

74 ms

Car-wash-roof,-wall-and-soffit-panels.jpg

Car-wash-roof,-wall-and-soffit-panels.jpg

46 ms

Exterior-wall-panel.jpg

Exterior-wall-panel.jpg

73 ms

Replacement-panels-for-old-factory-windows.jpg

Replacement-panels-for-old-factory-windows.jpg

27 ms

Translucent-clear-fiberglass-interior-wall-divider.jpg

Translucent-clear-fiberglass-interior-wall-divider.jpg

47 ms

Typical-buiding-roof-application.jpg

Typical-buiding-roof-application.jpg

74 ms

footer-corrugation.png

footer-corrugation.png

74 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

74 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

40 ms

kmKnZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNZaxY.ttf

kmKnZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNZaxY.ttf

42 ms

slick.woff

slick.woff

75 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

call-tracking_9.js

call-tracking_9.js

5 ms

wcm

wcm

35 ms

js

js

89 ms

Accessibility Review

dipcraft.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

dipcraft.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

dipcraft.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dipcraft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dipcraft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dipcraft.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dipcraft. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: