Tools & Wizards About Us
discoveryscreening.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

discoveryscreening.com

Discovery Screening - Early Detection Advanced Medical Thermal Imaging

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

197 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

399 ms

discoveryscreening.com screenshot

About Website

Visit discoveryscreening.com now to see the best up-to-date Discovery Screening content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about discoveryscreening.com

Advanced Medical Thermal Imaging by Discovery Screening - insider information without crushing and radiation - Thermography. Radiation-free Imaging for Cancer, Orthopaedic Issues & more

Visit discoveryscreening.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Discoveryscreening.com page load time and found that the first response time was 197 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

discoveryscreening.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.698

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

discoveryscreening.com

197 ms

www.discoveryscreening.com

700 ms

rokbox.css

89 ms

menu-15b46dae0159b4f5b9a5d52611b4d8f7.css

169 ms

grid-responsive.css

173 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Discoveryscreening.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (700 ms) belongs to the original domain Discoveryscreening.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 98.3 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Discoveryscreening.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 33.2 kB

  • Original 41.1 kB
  • After minification 32.5 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.6 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Discovery Screening images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 186.7 kB
  • After minification 183.4 kB
  • After compression 166.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 42.2 kB

  • Original 102.5 kB
  • After minification 101.5 kB
  • After compression 60.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Discoveryscreening.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.2 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (62%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Discovery Screening. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

discoveryscreening.com

discoveryscreening.com

197 ms

www.discoveryscreening.com

www.discoveryscreening.com

700 ms

rokbox.css

rokbox.css

89 ms

menu-15b46dae0159b4f5b9a5d52611b4d8f7.css

menu-15b46dae0159b4f5b9a5d52611b4d8f7.css

169 ms

grid-responsive.css

grid-responsive.css

173 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

246 ms

master-f9bbe7e9ce0aab112cdfd2a3b2a24007.css

master-f9bbe7e9ce0aab112cdfd2a3b2a24007.css

255 ms

mediaqueries.css

mediaqueries.css

167 ms

thirdparty-k2.css

thirdparty-k2.css

175 ms

lists.css

lists.css

265 ms

showcase.css

showcase.css

263 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

332 ms

core.js

core.js

270 ms

caption.js

caption.js

327 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

409 ms

rokbox.js

rokbox.js

435 ms

browser-engines.js

browser-engines.js

351 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

351 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

434 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

434 ms

mootools-mobile.js

mootools-mobile.js

442 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

443 ms

roksprocket.js

roksprocket.js

492 ms

roksprocket.request.js

roksprocket.request.js

495 ms

lists.js

lists.js

505 ms

lists.js

lists.js

500 ms

rokajaxsearch.js

rokajaxsearch.js

501 ms

moofx.js

moofx.js

509 ms

features.js

features.js

578 ms

showcase.js

showcase.js

581 ms

top-image-002.jpg

top-image-002.jpg

635 ms

logo.png

logo.png

173 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

90 ms

main-divider.png

main-divider.png

94 ms

FP-breast-head-thermography-02-450x165.jpg

FP-breast-head-thermography-02-450x165.jpg

135 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

92 ms

google-plus.png

google-plus.png

170 ms

FP-about-LisaKalison-80x80.jpg

FP-about-LisaKalison-80x80.jpg

178 ms

FP-about-JayMead-80x80.jpg

FP-about-JayMead-80x80.jpg

174 ms

FP-logo-iAMT-160x86.png

FP-logo-iAMT-160x86.png

178 ms

FP-logo-AAofT-330x60.png

FP-logo-AAofT-330x60.png

273 ms

main-newPic-DiscoveryScreening-955x260.jpg

main-newPic-DiscoveryScreening-955x260.jpg

331 ms

waffle.png

waffle.png

274 ms

rocket.png

rocket.png

274 ms

counter_xhtml.js

counter_xhtml.js

19 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

201 ms

SofiaProLight-webfont.woff

SofiaProLight-webfont.woff

264 ms

t.php

t.php

95 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

33 ms

collect

collect

26 ms

js

js

68 ms

Accessibility Review

discoveryscreening.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

discoveryscreening.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

discoveryscreening.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Discoveryscreening.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Discoveryscreening.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

discoveryscreening.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Discovery Screening. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: