Tools & Wizards About Us
discussdiets.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

discussdiets.com

Discuss Diets: Nutritional and Weight Loss Product Supplement Reviews - Discuss Diets

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

350 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

387 ms

discussdiets.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Discuss Diets content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about discussdiets.com

Anti-AgingAnti-Aging7 OffersAppetite SuppressantsAppetite Suppressants3 OffersBelly FatBelly Fat6 OffersBodybuildingBodybuilding8 OffersCleanse DietsCleanse

Visit discussdiets.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Discussdiets.com page load time and found that the first response time was 350 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

discussdiets.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.398

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

discussdiets.com

350 ms

style.css

247 ms

slidingpanel.css

61 ms

dynamiccomparison.css

22 ms

style.min.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Discussdiets.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Discussdiets.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 151.8 kB (19%)

Content Size

809.3 kB

After Optimization

657.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Discussdiets.com main page is 809.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 401.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 108.8 kB

  • Original 130.2 kB
  • After minification 116.6 kB
  • After compression 21.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 34.2 kB

  • Original 401.9 kB
  • After minification 367.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Discuss Diets images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 184.5 kB
  • After minification 184.5 kB
  • After compression 180.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 92.7 kB
  • After minification 92.7 kB
  • After compression 87.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Discussdiets.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (85%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Discuss Diets. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

discussdiets.com

discussdiets.com

350 ms

style.css

style.css

247 ms

slidingpanel.css

slidingpanel.css

61 ms

dynamiccomparison.css

dynamiccomparison.css

22 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

23 ms

css

css

33 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

37 ms

screen.min.css

screen.min.css

42 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

30 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

32 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

46 ms

post-2114.css

post-2114.css

43 ms

post-551.css

post-551.css

51 ms

eggrehub.css

eggrehub.css

58 ms

iconstyle.css

iconstyle.css

56 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

60 ms

quantity.css

quantity.css

69 ms

css

css

50 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

299 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

295 ms

price_alert.js

price_alert.js

311 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

309 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

386 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

490 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

540 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

308 ms

filterpanel.css

filterpanel.css

384 ms

tablechart.js

tablechart.js

541 ms

comparechart.js

comparechart.js

549 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

552 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

556 ms

inview.js

inview.js

733 ms

pgwmodal.js

pgwmodal.js

779 ms

unveil.js

unveil.js

774 ms

hoverintent.js

hoverintent.js

789 ms

countdown.js

countdown.js

807 ms

custom.js

custom.js

805 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

985 ms

ajaxcart.js

ajaxcart.js

1013 ms

quantity.js

quantity.js

1007 ms

wishcount.js

wishcount.js

1010 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1036 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1022 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1206 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1221 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1234 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

1233 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

1237 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1258 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

1430 ms

discuss-diets-logo.png

discuss-diets-logo.png

952 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

955 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

15 ms

rhicons.ttf

rhicons.ttf

1217 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

29 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

36 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

36 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

36 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

35 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

37 ms

skinny-mint-qlwg6panyqi3xml6mes42v1siwpi3la756285zmhao.png

skinny-mint-qlwg6panyqi3xml6mes42v1siwpi3la756285zmhao.png

13 ms

Screenshot-2023-03-01-8.00.19-PM-300x300.png

Screenshot-2023-03-01-8.00.19-PM-300x300.png

15 ms

Screenshot-2023-01-23-3.52.19-PM-300x300.png

Screenshot-2023-01-23-3.52.19-PM-300x300.png

14 ms

Screenshot-2023-01-08-8.19.15-AM-300x300.png

Screenshot-2023-01-08-8.19.15-AM-300x300.png

16 ms

Accessibility Review

discussdiets.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

discussdiets.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

discussdiets.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Discussdiets.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Discussdiets.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

discussdiets.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Discuss Diets. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: