Tools & Wizards About Us
distancebetweenplaces.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

distancebetweenplaces.net

Distance Between Places | Driving and Flight Distance Calculator

Page Load Speed

20.5 sec in total

First Response

8.2 sec

Resources Loaded

12 sec

Page Rendered

239 ms

distancebetweenplaces.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Distance Between Places content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about distancebetweenplaces.net

Let's calculate driving and flight distance and time with our website and travel around the world.

Visit distancebetweenplaces.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Distancebetweenplaces.net page load time and found that the first response time was 8.2 sec and then it took 12.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

distancebetweenplaces.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

distancebetweenplaces.net

8223 ms

basic.css

2142 ms

tabs.css

2796 ms

js

38 ms

show_ads.js

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Distancebetweenplaces.net, 58% (33 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Distancebetweenplaces.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 470.4 kB (61%)

Content Size

765.6 kB

After Optimization

295.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Distancebetweenplaces.net main page is 765.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 614.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 49.7 kB

  • Original 59.1 kB
  • After minification 58.9 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 80.1 kB
  • After minification 77.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Distance Between Places images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 408.0 kB

  • Original 614.7 kB
  • After minification 614.6 kB
  • After compression 206.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 408.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 11.8 kB
  • After minification 9.2 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Distancebetweenplaces.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (41%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Distance Between Places. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

distancebetweenplaces.net

distancebetweenplaces.net

8223 ms

basic.css

basic.css

2142 ms

tabs.css

tabs.css

2796 ms

js

js

38 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

7 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

436 ms

ca-pub-7294748932400245.js

ca-pub-7294748932400245.js

46 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

36 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

58 ms

hit

hit

269 ms

osd.js

osd.js

16 ms

common.js

common.js

21 ms

map.js

map.js

19 ms

util.js

util.js

76 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

74 ms

directions.js

directions.js

76 ms

onion.js

onion.js

25 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

79 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

70 ms

stats.js

stats.js

65 ms

controls.js

controls.js

61 ms

infowindow.js

infowindow.js

34 ms

css

css

97 ms

marker.js

marker.js

27 ms

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

131 ms

DirectionsService.Route

DirectionsService.Route

146 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

93 ms

google4.png

google4.png

33 ms

mapcnt6.png

mapcnt6.png

19 ms

sv5.png

sv5.png

29 ms

vt

vt

20 ms

vt

vt

18 ms

vt

vt

19 ms

vt

vt

20 ms

vt

vt

25 ms

vt

vt

27 ms

vt

vt

49 ms

vt

vt

48 ms

vt

vt

47 ms

vt

vt

49 ms

vt

vt

50 ms

vt

vt

50 ms

vt

vt

50 ms

vt

vt

51 ms

vt

vt

51 ms

vt

vt

51 ms

CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff

CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff

21 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

43 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

45 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOLO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOLO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

43 ms

poly.js

poly.js

37 ms

Roboto-Regular.ttf&color=ff333333&ax=44&ay=48&scale=1

Roboto-Regular.ttf&color=ff333333&ax=44&ay=48&scale=1

60 ms

maneuvers.png

maneuvers.png

54 ms

Roboto-Regular.ttf&color=ff333333&ax=44&ay=48&scale=1

Roboto-Regular.ttf&color=ff333333&ax=44&ay=48&scale=1

52 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

106 ms

vt

vt

34 ms

undo_poly.png

undo_poly.png

33 ms

SEO Factors

distancebetweenplaces.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Distancebetweenplaces.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Distancebetweenplaces.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

distancebetweenplaces.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Distance Between Places. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: