5.5 sec in total
250 ms
5 sec
180 ms
Click here to check amazing DIVEdigital content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about divedigital.de
BUILDING BRIDGES TO THE MOST INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY MARKET
Visit divedigital.deWe analyzed Divedigital.de page load time and found that the first response time was 250 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
divedigital.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.184
66/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
250 ms
405 ms
137 ms
234 ms
370 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Divedigital.de, 1% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Divedigital.de.
Page size can be reduced by 234.2 kB (18%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Divedigital.de main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 665.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. DIVEdigital images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 92.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.3 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Divedigital.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 73.2 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (92%)
76
6
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DIVEdigital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 67 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
divedigital.de
250 ms
www.divedigital.de
405 ms
2svhd.css
137 ms
2svhd.css
234 ms
2svhd.css
370 ms
2svhd.css
637 ms
2svhe.css
565 ms
2svhd.js
431 ms
2svhd.js
553 ms
index.js
331 ms
index.js
432 ms
qode-like.min.js
462 ms
core.min.js
539 ms
accordion.min.js
530 ms
menu.min.js
560 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
628 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
710 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
713 ms
dom-ready.min.js
711 ms
hooks.min.js
711 ms
i18n.min.js
738 ms
a11y.min.js
739 ms
autocomplete.min.js
741 ms
controlgroup.min.js
746 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
758 ms
button.min.js
806 ms
datepicker.min.js
841 ms
mouse.min.js
827 ms
resizable.min.js
847 ms
draggable.min.js
851 ms
dialog.min.js
887 ms
droppable.min.js
914 ms
progressbar.min.js
922 ms
selectable.min.js
938 ms
sortable.min.js
953 ms
slider.min.js
949 ms
spinner.min.js
985 ms
js
77 ms
tooltip.min.js
1012 ms
tabs.min.js
887 ms
effect.min.js
823 ms
effect-blind.min.js
721 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
684 ms
effect-clip.min.js
656 ms
effect-drop.min.js
686 ms
effect-explode.min.js
655 ms
effect-fade.min.js
626 ms
effect-fold.min.js
618 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
606 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
619 ms
effect-size.min.js
632 ms
effect-scale.min.js
594 ms
effect-shake.min.js
553 ms
effect-slide.min.js
550 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
555 ms
plugins.js
768 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
586 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
584 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
627 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
615 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
624 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
678 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
616 ms
jquery.stretch.js
627 ms
imagesloaded.js
615 ms
rangeslider.min.js
625 ms
jquery.event.move.js
692 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
658 ms
default_dynamic.js
637 ms
default.min.js
744 ms
custom_js.js
631 ms
comment-reply.min.js
638 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
672 ms
main.js
672 ms
dripicons-v2.woff
696 ms
DIVEdigital.png
687 ms
DIVEdigital_dark.png
662 ms
Picture1-3.jpg
945 ms
DIVEdigital_Logo-sehr-klein-300x62.png
712 ms
divedigital.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
divedigital.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
divedigital.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Divedigital.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Divedigital.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
divedigital.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of DIVEdigital. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: