7 sec in total
2.9 sec
3.6 sec
506 ms
Visit divorceprogramsreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Divorceprogramsreview content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about divorceprogramsreview.com
[fusion_separator style_type="shadow"
Visit divorceprogramsreview.comWe analyzed Divorceprogramsreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
divorceprogramsreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value440 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value7.9 s
44/100
10%
2896 ms
131 ms
133 ms
16 ms
203 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Divorceprogramsreview.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Divorceprogramsreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (48%)
2.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Divorceprogramsreview.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 943.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 943.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Divorceprogramsreview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 54.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 54.6 kB or 23% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Divorceprogramsreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 30% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (55%)
22
10
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Divorceprogramsreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
divorceprogramsreview.com
2896 ms
ccwrpt-front.css
131 ms
font-awesome.min.css
133 ms
css
16 ms
styles.css
203 ms
style.min.css
196 ms
icomoon.min.css
521 ms
jquery.min.js
201 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
196 ms
style.min.css
69 ms
index.js
69 ms
index.js
68 ms
comment-reply.min.js
75 ms
47a4e981e45db2e6e84f50141c1d28a1.min.js
307 ms
analytics.js
122 ms
fbevents.js
122 ms
Logomakr_4icfeb.png
160 ms
Logomakr_5lGkXA.png
159 ms
ccwrpt-buttons.png
194 ms
oie_transparent-4.png
488 ms
Logomakr_9ITyc1-e1472168478486.png
140 ms
Logomakr_5faeZr-e1472168397188.png
159 ms
Logomakr_3LM8Wg-e1472168511364.png
202 ms
awb-icons.woff
142 ms
font
73 ms
font
73 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
200 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
150 ms
collect
50 ms
divorceprogramsreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
divorceprogramsreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
divorceprogramsreview.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Divorceprogramsreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Divorceprogramsreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
divorceprogramsreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Divorceprogramsreview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: