Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

dixa.com

Dixa | The CX Platform for Consumer Brands

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

460 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.6 sec

dixa.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dixa.com homepage info - get ready to check Dixa best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about dixa.com

Unlock customer loyalty at scale. Book a demo today and experience the power of Dixa's all-in-one AI-driven customer service platform.

Visit dixa.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dixa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 460 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dixa.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.073

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dixa.com

460 ms

www.dixa.com

292 ms

rum.js

23 ms

style.css

364 ms

vendor.4c40c31357a2e777c1ef14b501a5ab87.css

375 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Dixa.com, 85% (52 requests) were made to Cdn.marketing.dixa.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Rum.uptime.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (602 ms) relates to the external source Js-eu1.hsforms.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 343.0 kB (8%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Dixa.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 312.2 kB

  • Original 373.5 kB
  • After minification 246.9 kB
  • After compression 61.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 126.6 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 312.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 30.8 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 4.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dixa images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (5%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

53

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dixa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

dixa.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

dixa.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

dixa.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dixa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dixa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dixa. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: