1.5 sec in total
56 ms
908 ms
518 ms
Welcome to dixfractions.com homepage info - get ready to check Dixfractions best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about dixfractions.com
Nous sommes une équipe de spécialistes en Conception Web, Référencement sur Google (SEO) et Marketing Web. Convertissez vos visiteurs en clients!
Visit dixfractions.comWe analyzed Dixfractions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
dixfractions.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value8.4 s
19/100
10%
Value2,370 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
56 ms
154 ms
52 ms
85 ms
113 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Dixfractions.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (555 ms) relates to the external source Log.cookieyes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 173.4 kB (19%)
937.1 kB
763.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Dixfractions.com main page is 937.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 694.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 173.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 173.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dixfractions images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (59%)
63
26
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dixfractions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dixfractions.com
56 ms
dixfractions.com
154 ms
script.js
52 ms
style.min.css
85 ms
font-awesome.min.css
113 ms
font-awesome-v4-shims.min.css
93 ms
basic.css
88 ms
grid.css
88 ms
theme-style.css
108 ms
elements.css
94 ms
style.css
97 ms
responsive.css
97 ms
js_composer.min.css
159 ms
pum-site-styles.css
101 ms
sccss.css
103 ms
css
85 ms
jquery.min.js
133 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
119 ms
modernizr.custom.js
122 ms
js
97 ms
conversion_async.js
83 ms
conversion.js
84 ms
v4-shims.min.css
120 ms
all.min.css
136 ms
css
84 ms
styles.css
132 ms
plugins.js
401 ms
main.js
152 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
147 ms
core.min.js
149 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
168 ms
api.js
82 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
271 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
270 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
398 ms
index.js
399 ms
index.js
399 ms
index.js
399 ms
akismet-frontend.js
400 ms
swap.js
402 ms
log
555 ms
css
74 ms
logo-dixfraction.png
133 ms
RiveNord-2024.png
135 ms
slide-lion-1920x900.jpg
135 ms
slide-zebre-3-1-1920x900.jpg
134 ms
slide-tigre-1920x900.jpg
135 ms
slide-paon-1920x900-2-1920x900.jpg
134 ms
slide-girafe-dalmatien-1920x900.jpg
139 ms
slide-singe-1920x900.jpg
141 ms
accueil-visibilite.jpeg
139 ms
accueil-conception-web.jpeg
138 ms
accueil-strategie.jpeg
140 ms
bg-parallax-1-1920x900.jpg
140 ms
conception-site-wordpress-jbexpair-noir-150x150.jpg
254 ms
developpement-boutique-en-ligne-bulles-et-pirouettes-noir-150x150.jpg
254 ms
creation-site-web-wordpress-comax-noir-150x150.jpg
253 ms
creation-landing-page-tremblay-criminaliste-noir-150x150.jpg
253 ms
creation-site-web-wordpress-gmf-des-seigneurs-noir-150x150.jpg
253 ms
conception-site-wordpress-compta-premium-noir-150x150.jpg
253 ms
bg-footer-7-1920x594.jpg
312 ms
grve-dummy-sample-image-medium.png
312 ms
font
120 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
178 ms
blade-icons.woff
177 ms
font
119 ms
font
120 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
179 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
176 ms
148 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
57 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
56 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
56 ms
font
54 ms
35 ms
dixfractions.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
dixfractions.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
dixfractions.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dixfractions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dixfractions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dixfractions.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dixfractions. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: