Tools & Wizards About Us
dixie.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

dixie.org

Home Page

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

216 ms

dixie.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Dixie content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dixie.org

Visit dixie.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Dixie.org page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dixie.org performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.dixie.org

199 ms

ip-utilities.js

278 ms

PageTypes.css

466 ms

default.css

263 ms

urchin.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Dixie.org, 22% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (614 ms) belongs to the original domain Dixie.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.6 kB (78%)

Content Size

142.4 kB

After Optimization

30.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dixie.org main page is 142.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 81.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 3.1 kB
  • After minification 3.0 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 61% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 607 B

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dixie needs image optimization as it can save up to 607 B or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 60.4 kB

  • Original 81.9 kB
  • After minification 72.5 kB
  • After compression 21.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 48.7 kB

  • Original 54.8 kB
  • After minification 41.3 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dixie.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dixie. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

www.dixie.org

www.dixie.org

199 ms

ip-utilities.js

ip-utilities.js

278 ms

PageTypes.css

PageTypes.css

466 ms

default.css

default.css

263 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

8 ms

splash+v3.jpg

splash+v3.jpg

261 ms

ACTIVE+White+Logo.png

ACTIVE+White+Logo.png

614 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

110 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

4 ms

Accessibility Review

dixie.org accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

dixie.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

dixie.org SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dixie.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Dixie.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

dixie.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dixie. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: