2.2 sec in total
434 ms
1.7 sec
134 ms
Click here to check amazing Dixon Engineering content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dixonengineering.net
Dixon Engineering, Inc. (DIXON) is located in Lake Odessa, Michigan. We were founded in 1981 and incorporated in the State of Michigan in 1984. DIXON is a consulting engineering firm specializing in t...
Visit dixonengineering.netWe analyzed Dixonengineering.net page load time and found that the first response time was 434 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
dixonengineering.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.7 s
10/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.045
99/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
434 ms
68 ms
192 ms
224 ms
131 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Dixonengineering.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (519 ms) belongs to the original domain Dixonengineering.net.
Page size can be reduced by 150.7 kB (10%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Dixonengineering.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dixon Engineering images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dixonengineering.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (63%)
41
15
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dixon Engineering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.dixonengineering.net
434 ms
style.css
68 ms
formidablepro.css
192 ms
styles.css
224 ms
wppa-style.css
131 ms
swfobject.js
139 ms
jquery.js
250 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
130 ms
jquery.form.min.js
204 ms
wppa-utils.min.js
195 ms
wppa.min.js
207 ms
wppa-slideshow.min.js
263 ms
wppa-ajax-front.min.js
265 ms
wppa-popup.min.js
267 ms
wppa-touch.min.js
271 ms
wppa-init.en.js
288 ms
easy-columns.css
314 ms
script.js
329 ms
scripts.js
349 ms
wp-embed.min.js
349 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
263 ms
page_t.jpg
111 ms
sheet_s.png
111 ms
sheet_h.png
110 ms
sheet_v.png
110 ms
header.png
112 ms
header.jpg
137 ms
vmenuitem.png
188 ms
block_s.png
130 ms
block_h.png
135 ms
block_v.png
130 ms
blockheader.png
133 ms
button.png
306 ms
P72100801.jpg
197 ms
62005-0051.jpg
199 ms
fulls.png
200 ms
loading.gif
215 ms
12.png
519 ms
footer_s.png
243 ms
footer_b.png
249 ms
ga.js
7 ms
__utm.gif
57 ms
dixonengineering.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
dixonengineering.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
dixonengineering.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dixonengineering.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dixonengineering.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dixonengineering.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dixon Engineering. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: