2.1 sec in total
285 ms
1.6 sec
204 ms
Welcome to dnscontrol.org homepage info - get ready to check DNSControl best content right away, or after learning these important things about dnscontrol.org
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit dnscontrol.orgWe analyzed Dnscontrol.org page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
dnscontrol.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value2.7 s
86/100
25%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
285 ms
218 ms
53 ms
36 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Dnscontrol.org, 9% (11 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (340 ms) relates to the external source Gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 710.7 kB (63%)
1.1 MB
425.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Dnscontrol.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 772.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, DNSControl needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 502.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 502.5 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dnscontrol.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.5 kB or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (75%)
102
25
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DNSControl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dnscontrol.org
285 ms
monetate.js
218 ms
application.css
53 ms
ng-modal.css
36 ms
angular.min.js
62 ms
ng-modal.js
46 ms
google_analytics.js
46 ms
google_oauth.js
45 ms
bold_chat.js
45 ms
eloqua.js
49 ms
hotjar.js
50 ms
adroll.js
49 ms
impactRadius.js
48 ms
in.js
124 ms
api.js
67 ms
api:client.js
71 ms
app.js
48 ms
cookies.js
50 ms
socialMedia.js
47 ms
countryDropdown.js
49 ms
monetate.js
49 ms
index.js
49 ms
lander.js
49 ms
seoPages.js
51 ms
sitePages.js
50 ms
search.js
51 ms
modal.js
51 ms
forms.js
59 ms
tldSelector.js
55 ms
setFixedTop.js
52 ms
searchBar.js
53 ms
currency.js
53 ms
trust.js
56 ms
conversion.js
39 ms
tdfs-inner.css
53 ms
tdfs-temp.css
55 ms
thankyou.css
56 ms
entry.js
9 ms
css
24 ms
fontawesome.min.css
13 ms
bd-icons.min.css
12 ms
ga.js
26 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
24 ms
userspace
158 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
279 ms
recaptcha__en.js
340 ms
all.js
149 ms
338 ms
logo-header-2x.png
265 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
259 ms
280 ms
hotjar-10205.js
308 ms
elqCfg.min.js
212 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
188 ms
bg-select.png
187 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
188 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
138 ms
__utm.gif
122 ms
framework
156 ms
__utm.gif
72 ms
__utm.gif
73 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
64 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
65 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
64 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
65 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
69 ms
280 ms
postmessageRelay
125 ms
76 ms
collect
202 ms
xd_arbiter.php
86 ms
xd_arbiter.php
115 ms
svrGP
191 ms
svrGP
173 ms
anchor
67 ms
iframe
54 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
45 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
108 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
106 ms
styles__ltr.css
46 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
109 ms
XIeAEBTR99FHtnz9GJvmJ1XccQZVVixQNk9jb_OO4Io.js
30 ms
webworker.js
34 ms
logo_48.png
26 ms
svrGP.aspx
37 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
39 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
39 ms
svrGP.aspx
48 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
14 ms
iframerpc
26 ms
recaptcha__en.js
7 ms
vms.js
73 ms
roundtrip.js
13 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
36 ms
bc.pv
86 ms
xd_arbiter.php
20 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
18 ms
out
19 ms
53 ms
24 ms
44 ms
out
22 ms
out
23 ms
out
44 ms
out
44 ms
out
47 ms
out
43 ms
out
44 ms
41 ms
194 ms
u.php
122 ms
adsct
118 ms
pxj
27 ms
pixel
70 ms
37 ms
sd
9 ms
u.php
109 ms
u.php
139 ms
u.php
142 ms
377928.gif
19 ms
u.php
144 ms
u.php
153 ms
Pug
38 ms
in
17 ms
tap.php
82 ms
dnscontrol.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
dnscontrol.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
dnscontrol.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dnscontrol.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Dnscontrol.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dnscontrol.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of DNSControl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: