Tools & Wizards About Us
doctors-choice.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

doctors-choice.de

DoctorsChoice

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

942 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

292 ms

doctors-choice.de screenshot

About Website

Visit doctors-choice.de now to see the best up-to-date Doctors Choice content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about doctors-choice.de

Visit doctors-choice.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Doctors-choice.de page load time and found that the first response time was 942 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

doctors-choice.de performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.doctors-choice.de

942 ms

wp-forecast-default.css

145 ms

skin.css

263 ms

skin.css

263 ms

nggallery.css

265 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Doctors-choice.de, 3% (2 requests) were made to Stats.wordpress.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Doctors-choice.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 343.0 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Doctors-choice.de main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 992.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 41.3 kB

  • Original 51.4 kB
  • After minification 48.5 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 98.1 kB

  • Original 992.2 kB
  • After minification 894.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Doctors Choice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 167.8 kB

  • Original 275.2 kB
  • After minification 264.6 kB
  • After compression 107.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 167.8 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 35.8 kB

  • Original 44.1 kB
  • After minification 31.7 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Doctors-choice.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (44%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Doctors Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.doctors-choice.de

www.doctors-choice.de

942 ms

wp-forecast-default.css

wp-forecast-default.css

145 ms

skin.css

skin.css

263 ms

skin.css

skin.css

263 ms

nggallery.css

nggallery.css

265 ms

shutter-reloaded.css

shutter-reloaded.css

353 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

430 ms

wpf_update.js

wpf_update.js

323 ms

shutter-reloaded.js

shutter-reloaded.js

392 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

392 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

404 ms

slidedeck.jquery.lite.pack.js

slidedeck.jquery.lite.pack.js

458 ms

index.php

index.php

721 ms

jquery.cycle.js

jquery.cycle.js

522 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

531 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

559 ms

style.css

style.css

598 ms

nav.css

nav.css

664 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

665 ms

template-style.css

template-style.css

659 ms

ui.tabs.css

ui.tabs.css

695 ms

jquery-1.2.2.pack.js

jquery-1.2.2.pack.js

733 ms

dropdowns.js

dropdowns.js

791 ms

ui.tabs.pack.js

ui.tabs.pack.js

797 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

919 ms

superb-slideshow.js

superb-slideshow.js

853 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

853 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

4 ms

esel.js

esel.js

856 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

19 ms

Featured_banner_Fynbos.jpg

Featured_banner_Fynbos.jpg

251 ms

Featured_banner_HFH.jpg

Featured_banner_HFH.jpg

261 ms

Featured_banner_Aabadi-Safari.jpg

Featured_banner_Aabadi-Safari.jpg

165 ms

Featured_banner_Seidelberg_Wine_Estate.jpg

Featured_banner_Seidelberg_Wine_Estate.jpg

180 ms

Featured_banner_The_Oceana.jpg

Featured_banner_The_Oceana.jpg

200 ms

Featured_banner_Evergreen_Manor.jpg

Featured_banner_Evergreen_Manor.jpg

252 ms

Featured_banner_Moontide.png

Featured_banner_Moontide.png

542 ms

Featured_banner_Buffelsdrift.jpg

Featured_banner_Buffelsdrift.jpg

433 ms

Featured_banner_Heidi_brown.png

Featured_banner_Heidi_brown.png

551 ms

Featured_banner_Baysands_Lodge.png

Featured_banner_Baysands_Lodge.png

617 ms

las_vegas.jpg

las_vegas.jpg

377 ms

Kenia%2075x75.jpg

Kenia%2075x75.jpg

383 ms

aegypten-75x75.jpg

aegypten-75x75.jpg

504 ms

Illyria-75x75.jpg

Illyria-75x75.jpg

512 ms

Rovos-75x75.jpg

Rovos-75x75.jpg

557 ms

Apartment-75x75.jpg

Apartment-75x75.jpg

630 ms

Hai75x75.jpg

Hai75x75.jpg

647 ms

Loewe75x75.jpg

Loewe75x75.jpg

664 ms

03.gif

03.gif

672 ms

Flashbook_Illyria_klein.jpg

Flashbook_Illyria_klein.jpg

693 ms

ga.js

ga.js

8 ms

bg_branding.png

bg_branding.png

1119 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

19 ms

illyria.jpg

illyria.jpg

1138 ms

rovosrail.jpg

rovosrail.jpg

1004 ms

asara.jpg

asara.jpg

1032 ms

fynbos.jpg

fynbos.jpg

1026 ms

amakhala.jpg

amakhala.jpg

1178 ms

bg_featured.jpg

bg_featured.jpg

1128 ms

g.gif

g.gif

16 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

1064 ms

print.css

print.css

129 ms

Accessibility Review

doctors-choice.de accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

doctors-choice.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

doctors-choice.de SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Doctors-choice.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Doctors-choice.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

doctors-choice.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Doctors Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: