Tools & Wizards About Us
documentscan.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

documentscan.in

Document Scanning Services - Large Format Scanning, Book Scanning, Photo Scanning, Microfilm Scanning

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

documentscan.in screenshot

About Website

Visit documentscan.in now to see the best up-to-date Document Scan content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about documentscan.in

Discover the benefits of digitizing your office records with our professional large format scanning services. Improve efficiency, accessibility, and storage space while preserving important documents....

Visit documentscan.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Documentscan.in page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

documentscan.in performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.42

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

documentscan.in

108 ms

documentscan.in

416 ms

css2

51 ms

css2

60 ms

all.min.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Documentscan.in, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (946 ms) belongs to the original domain Documentscan.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.8 MB (38%)

Content Size

10.1 MB

After Optimization

6.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Documentscan.in main page is 10.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 71.6 kB

  • Original 88.4 kB
  • After minification 67.4 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.1 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 2.9 MB

  • Original 8.9 MB
  • After minification 6.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Document Scan needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.9 MB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 621.5 kB

  • Original 851.3 kB
  • After minification 832.5 kB
  • After compression 229.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 621.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 243.5 kB

  • Original 274.2 kB
  • After minification 199.4 kB
  • After compression 30.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Documentscan.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 243.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (47%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Document Scan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

documentscan.in

documentscan.in

108 ms

documentscan.in

documentscan.in

416 ms

css2

css2

51 ms

css2

css2

60 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

46 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

41 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

262 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

161 ms

tempusdominus-bootstrap-4.min.css

tempusdominus-bootstrap-4.min.css

214 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

510 ms

style.css

style.css

211 ms

amp-analytics-0.1.js

amp-analytics-0.1.js

48 ms

js

js

79 ms

js

js

138 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

19 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

15 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

52 ms

easing.min.js

easing.min.js

69 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

102 ms

counterup.min.js

counterup.min.js

116 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

216 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

527 ms

moment-timezone.min.js

moment-timezone.min.js

153 ms

tempusdominus-bootstrap-4.min.js

tempusdominus-bootstrap-4.min.js

215 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

32 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

32 ms

main.js

main.js

166 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

192 ms

embed

embed

285 ms

logo.png

logo.png

155 ms

document-scanning-digitization-bg.png

document-scanning-digitization-bg.png

251 ms

google-reviews.png

google-reviews.png

155 ms

11.png

11.png

155 ms

22.png

22.png

154 ms

33.png

33.png

153 ms

44.png

44.png

183 ms

about-bg.png

about-bg.png

497 ms

award-1.jpg

award-1.jpg

183 ms

award-2.jpg

award-2.jpg

182 ms

award-3.jpg

award-3.jpg

249 ms

award-4.jpg

award-4.jpg

251 ms

iso-14001-2015.png

iso-14001-2015.png

298 ms

iso-27001-2013.png

iso-27001-2013.png

297 ms

iso-29861-2009.png

iso-29861-2009.png

553 ms

iso-9001-2015.png

iso-9001-2015.png

453 ms

iso-tr-13028-2010.png

iso-tr-13028-2010.png

551 ms

rohs-2405en-3645.png

rohs-2405en-3645.png

399 ms

document-scanning-bg.png

document-scanning-bg.png

401 ms

document-digitization.png

document-digitization.png

450 ms

services-bg.png

services-bg.png

455 ms

services.png

services.png

554 ms

document-management-system.png

document-management-system.png

657 ms

scannplus-model.png

scannplus-model.png

507 ms

environment.png

environment.png

946 ms

associated-services.png

associated-services.png

609 ms

contact-bg.jpg

contact-bg.jpg

600 ms

quick-enquiry.png

quick-enquiry.png

602 ms

BngRUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsYCB.ttf

BngRUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsYCB.ttf

62 ms

BngSUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbg95DiC.ttf

BngSUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbg95DiC.ttf

101 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUE.ttf

120 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9ogUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9ogUE.ttf

122 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvgUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvgUE.ttf

119 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUE.ttf

121 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vgUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vgUE.ttf

120 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvgUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvgUE.ttf

122 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

33 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

60 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

60 ms

js

js

34 ms

search.js

search.js

4 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

12 ms

Accessibility Review

documentscan.in accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best Practices

documentscan.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

documentscan.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Documentscan.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Documentscan.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

documentscan.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Document Scan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: