Tools & Wizards About Us
docusnap.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

docusnap.net

Docusnap – Inventory, Analysis and IT Documentation

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

312 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

859 ms

docusnap.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Docusnap content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about docusnap.net

Docusnap creates automated IT documentation and provides features such as an ITIL CMDB, Permission Analysis, IT Concepts and License Management.

Visit docusnap.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Docusnap.net page load time and found that the first response time was 312 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

docusnap.net performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

docusnap.net

312 ms

598 ms

container_AOwZWgB3.js

749 ms

gtm.js

68 ms

421-layout.css

128 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Docusnap.net, 75% (49 requests) were made to Media.docusnap.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Docusnap.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (749 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.matomo.cloud.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (37%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Docusnap.net main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 89.4 kB

  • Original 106.1 kB
  • After minification 99.3 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Docusnap needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 146.7 kB
  • After minification 146.7 kB
  • After compression 146.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (13%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

55

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Docusnap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

docusnap.net

docusnap.net

312 ms

598 ms

container_AOwZWgB3.js

container_AOwZWgB3.js

749 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

68 ms

421-layout.css

421-layout.css

128 ms

styledsv2.min.css

styledsv2.min.css

268 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

655 ms

nqw1lj17ty.jsonp

nqw1lj17ty.jsonp

31 ms

E-v1.js

E-v1.js

38 ms

wistia-conditional-loader.js

wistia-conditional-loader.js

78 ms

421-layout.js

421-layout.js

306 ms

custom-scripts.js

custom-scripts.js

33 ms

docusnap_logo.png

docusnap_logo.png

182 ms

swatch

swatch

14 ms

DS_icon-sprite.png

DS_icon-sprite.png

175 ms

Docusnap_Header_Produkt.png

Docusnap_Header_Produkt.png

189 ms

Generali.png

Generali.png

186 ms

Scania.png

Scania.png

187 ms

logo-drv-hessen.png

logo-drv-hessen.png

187 ms

Emmi.png

Emmi.png

186 ms

bayerische-boerse.png

bayerische-boerse.png

185 ms

sunnycars.png

sunnycars.png

190 ms

Accor.png

Accor.png

192 ms

Weihenstephan.png

Weihenstephan.png

193 ms

Adelholzener.png

Adelholzener.png

189 ms

Liqui-Moly.png

Liqui-Moly.png

191 ms

logo-bergader.png

logo-bergader.png

195 ms

tipico.png

tipico.png

195 ms

Henglein.png

Henglein.png

195 ms

logo-meiller.png

logo-meiller.png

194 ms

Arevipharma.png

Arevipharma.png

195 ms

Asklepios.png

Asklepios.png

196 ms

Bechtle.png

Bechtle.png

199 ms

Concorde.png

Concorde.png

202 ms

logo-Arche.jpg

logo-Arche.jpg

198 ms

logo-Baeko-Ost.jpg

logo-Baeko-Ost.jpg

197 ms

logo-City-University-of-London.png

logo-City-University-of-London.png

199 ms

logo-Dom.png

logo-Dom.png

205 ms

logo-G%C3%B6rtz.jpg

logo-G%C3%B6rtz.jpg

212 ms

logo-MSC.jpg

logo-MSC.jpg

206 ms

logo-OMEGA-technology.jpg

logo-OMEGA-technology.jpg

206 ms

logo-Rohde-und-Schwarz.png

logo-Rohde-und-Schwarz.png

206 ms

logo-SKRapid.png

logo-SKRapid.png

206 ms

logo-Stiftung_Attl.jpg

logo-Stiftung_Attl.jpg

209 ms

logo-zoo_Berlin.jpg

logo-zoo_Berlin.jpg

208 ms

logo-beg.png

logo-beg.png

210 ms

logo-koelner-zoo.png

logo-koelner-zoo.png

211 ms

logo-ifn.jpg

logo-ifn.jpg

209 ms

logo-trolli.png

logo-trolli.png

211 ms

circle-arrow-right-black.svg

circle-arrow-right-black.svg

104 ms

matomo.php

matomo.php

501 ms

configs.php

configs.php

392 ms

logo-grawe.png

logo-grawe.png

60 ms

logo-Midas.png

logo-Midas.png

40 ms

logo-Nolte.png

logo-Nolte.png

31 ms

Docusnap_Header_product.png

Docusnap_Header_product.png

33 ms

Docusnap_Graphic_automated-creation.png

Docusnap_Graphic_automated-creation.png

34 ms

Docusnap_Graphic_reports.png

Docusnap_Graphic_reports.png

31 ms

Docusnap_Graphic_individual-customizing.png

Docusnap_Graphic_individual-customizing.png

32 ms

DS12_Screenshot_EN_Visualization-Dependencies_1120.png

DS12_Screenshot_EN_Visualization-Dependencies_1120.png

32 ms

DS12_Screenshot_EN_Network-Map_1120.png

DS12_Screenshot_EN_Network-Map_1120.png

32 ms

DS12_Screenshot_EN_Concept-Editor_1120.png

DS12_Screenshot_EN_Concept-Editor_1120.png

32 ms

DS12_Screenshot_EN_Permission-Analysis-Group-Memberships_1120.png

DS12_Screenshot_EN_Permission-Analysis-Group-Memberships_1120.png

32 ms

DS12_Screenshot_EN_Web-Client_1120.png

DS12_Screenshot_EN_Web-Client_1120.png

31 ms

circle-info-primary.png

circle-info-primary.png

32 ms

Accessibility Review

docusnap.net accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

docusnap.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

docusnap.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Docusnap.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Docusnap.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

docusnap.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Docusnap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: