Tools & Wizards About Us
doopmedia.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

doopmedia.com

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

572 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

316 ms

doopmedia.com screenshot

About Website

Visit doopmedia.com now to see the best up-to-date Doopmedia content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about doopmedia.com

DOOPMEDIA

Visit doopmedia.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Doopmedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 572 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

doopmedia.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value570 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.246

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

doopmedia.com

572 ms

css

37 ms

css

50 ms

normalize.css

177 ms

animate.css

358 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Doopmedia.com, 52% (51 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Doopmedia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 897.0 kB (69%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

407.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Doopmedia.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 814.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 44.7 kB

  • Original 49.4 kB
  • After minification 48.4 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.7 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 29.4 kB

  • Original 127.4 kB
  • After minification 98.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Doopmedia needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.4 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 555.2 kB

  • Original 814.8 kB
  • After minification 797.6 kB
  • After compression 259.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 555.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 267.8 kB

  • Original 312.4 kB
  • After minification 285.1 kB
  • After compression 44.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Doopmedia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 267.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (66%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Doopmedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

doopmedia.com

doopmedia.com

572 ms

css

css

37 ms

css

css

50 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

177 ms

animate.css

animate.css

358 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

263 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

352 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

445 ms

style.css

style.css

267 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

355 ms

teal.css

teal.css

437 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

441 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

784 ms

easing.js

easing.js

525 ms

animate.min.js

animate.min.js

528 ms

timer.js

timer.js

696 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

707 ms

classie.js

classie.js

616 ms

nicescroll.min.js

nicescroll.min.js

871 ms

validate.min.js

validate.min.js

825 ms

form.min.js

form.min.js

878 ms

mousewheel.js

mousewheel.js

870 ms

velocity.min.js

velocity.min.js

966 ms

flexslider.min.js

flexslider.min.js

1042 ms

js

js

90 ms

map.js

map.js

960 ms

main.js

main.js

1156 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

856 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

601 ms

-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

6 ms

8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

12 ms

RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

14 ms

bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf

bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf

11 ms

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

13 ms

PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

14 ms

~text

~text

72 ms

common.js

common.js

18 ms

map.js

map.js

51 ms

util.js

util.js

122 ms

marker.js

marker.js

85 ms

onion.js

onion.js

56 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

110 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

166 ms

stats.js

stats.js

62 ms

controls.js

controls.js

52 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

19 ms

css

css

60 ms

google4.png

google4.png

19 ms

marker.png

marker.png

135 ms

mapcnt6.png

mapcnt6.png

22 ms

sv5.png

sv5.png

22 ms

google_white5.png

google_white5.png

21 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

66 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

77 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

78 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

79 ms

vt

vt

53 ms

vt

vt

77 ms

vt

vt

57 ms

vt

vt

59 ms

vt

vt

55 ms

vt

vt

86 ms

vt

vt

89 ms

vt

vt

91 ms

vt

vt

84 ms

vt

vt

98 ms

vt

vt

115 ms

vt

vt

112 ms

vt

vt

130 ms

vt

vt

146 ms

vt

vt

123 ms

vt

vt

154 ms

vt

vt

147 ms

vt

vt

152 ms

vt

vt

153 ms

vt

vt

161 ms

vt

vt

173 ms

vt

vt

185 ms

vt

vt

180 ms

vt

vt

188 ms

vt

vt

177 ms

vt

vt

185 ms

vt

vt

214 ms

vt

vt

207 ms

vt

vt

212 ms

vt

vt

209 ms

vt

vt

224 ms

vt

vt

217 ms

vt

vt

256 ms

vt

vt

250 ms

vt

vt

249 ms

vt

vt

240 ms

vt

vt

237 ms

vt

vt

210 ms

vt

vt

227 ms

vt

vt

234 ms

vt

vt

226 ms

vt

vt

206 ms

Accessibility Review

doopmedia.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

doopmedia.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

doopmedia.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Doopmedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Doopmedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

doopmedia.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Doopmedia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: