Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

downboard.com screenshot

About Website

Visit downboard.com now to see the best up-to-date Downboard content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about downboard.com

Premium domain names for marketing, campaign strategies, and new project creation. Largest collection of advertising domains in the world.

Visit downboard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Downboard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

downboard.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.5 s

71/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

downboard.com

14 ms

domains-for-sale

290 ms

font-faces

50 ms

_slug_.CxIEXTrI.css

125 ms

oa_logo1-AwvOwogNnWHwRaJv.png

142 ms

Our browser made a total of 202 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Downboard.com, 98% (198 requests) were made to Assets.zyrosite.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Officialagency.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (487 ms) relates to the external source Assets.zyrosite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 647.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

4.9 MB

After Optimization

4.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Downboard.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 647.3 kB

  • Original 695.2 kB
  • After minification 679.9 kB
  • After compression 47.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 647.3 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 501 B

  • Original 4.2 MB
  • After minification 4.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Downboard images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 32 B

  • Original 26.0 kB
  • After minification 26.0 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Downboard.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

200

After Optimization

200

The browser has sent 200 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Downboard. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

downboard.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

downboard.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

downboard.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Downboard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Downboard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Downboard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: