Tools & Wizards About Us
downeydesign.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

downeydesign.net

Downey Design | Website Design, Graphic Design & Marketing

Page Load Speed

23.9 sec in total

First Response

899 ms

Resources Loaded

20.5 sec

Page Rendered

2.5 sec

downeydesign.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to downeydesign.net homepage info - get ready to check Downey Design best content right away, or after learning these important things about downeydesign.net

Make the best possible first impression online, we design websites that remove the barrier your site is putting between your audience and your message.

Visit downeydesign.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Downeydesign.net page load time and found that the first response time was 899 ms and then it took 23 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

downeydesign.net performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.246

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

downeydesign.net

899 ms

analytics.js

138 ms

bundle_playback_v_MzYkZ0TU.js

461 ms

wombat_v_UHAOicsW.js

451 ms

banner_styles_v_S1zqJCYt.css

473 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Downeydesign.net, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Downeydesign.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (18%)

Content Size

11.7 MB

After Optimization

9.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Downeydesign.net main page is 11.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 69.4 kB

  • Original 87.0 kB
  • After minification 86.8 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 2.0 MB

  • Original 11.6 MB
  • After minification 9.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Downey Design needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 MB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

34

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Downey Design. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

downeydesign.net

downeydesign.net

899 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

138 ms

bundle_playback_v_MzYkZ0TU.js

bundle_playback_v_MzYkZ0TU.js

461 ms

wombat_v_UHAOicsW.js

wombat_v_UHAOicsW.js

451 ms

banner_styles_v_S1zqJCYt.css

banner_styles_v_S1zqJCYt.css

473 ms

iconochive_v_qtvMKcIJ.css

iconochive_v_qtvMKcIJ.css

470 ms

81fvn.css

81fvn.css

506 ms

81fvp.js

81fvp.js

232 ms

1512677628index.js

1512677628index.js

467 ms

1512677628index.js

1512677628index.js

488 ms

81fvo.js

81fvo.js

512 ms

81fvo.js

81fvo.js

494 ms

bpv34.js

bpv34.js

512 ms

81fvo.js

81fvo.js

605 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

92 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

114 ms

DD_New_logo_2017_White.png

DD_New_logo_2017_White.png

648 ms

Mock_Up_two.png

Mock_Up_two.png

1790 ms

Screenshot_2017_12_07_13.12.49.png

Screenshot_2017_12_07_13.12.49.png

2428 ms

Screenshot_2017_12_07_12.13.43.png

Screenshot_2017_12_07_12.13.43.png

2210 ms

Screenshot_2017_10_04_13.17.20.png

Screenshot_2017_10_04_13.17.20.png

2203 ms

Screenshot_2017_12_07_12.15.18.png

Screenshot_2017_12_07_12.15.18.png

1554 ms

Screenshot_2017_12_07_12.10.06.png

Screenshot_2017_12_07_12.10.06.png

2555 ms

Screenshot_2017_12_07_12.06.27.png

Screenshot_2017_12_07_12.06.27.png

2048 ms

Shawn_s_Headshot_12_09__Small_.jpg

Shawn_s_Headshot_12_09__Small_.jpg

2067 ms

photo.jpg.png

photo.jpg.png

19536 ms

14_jteeapparel.gif

14_jteeapparel.gif

2291 ms

calvary6_logo_black_and_white.jpg

calvary6_logo_black_and_white.jpg

2318 ms

greemans_new_logob_black_and_white_copy.png

greemans_new_logob_black_and_white_copy.png

2446 ms

resonate_2a508x101.png

resonate_2a508x101.png

2480 ms

sage_1_copy.png

sage_1_copy.png

2537 ms

Beyond_Our_Design7BW.jpg

Beyond_Our_Design7BW.jpg

2819 ms

casadeoracion_1.png

casadeoracion_1.png

2691 ms

AJE_logo_1_copy.jpg

AJE_logo_1_copy.jpg

2729 ms

LJC.jpg

LJC.jpg

2730 ms

MT_logo_for_website_bw_copy.jpg

MT_logo_for_website_bw_copy.jpg

2787 ms

next_steps1_black_and_white_copy.png

next_steps1_black_and_white_copy.png

2802 ms

Pines_traditional_logo_copy_copy.png

Pines_traditional_logo_copy_copy.png

2964 ms

VicFitPerf4_copy.png

VicFitPerf4_copy.png

2994 ms

CCN6b_2a_w_TAG_blackwhite.png

CCN6b_2a_w_TAG_blackwhite.png

3022 ms

NS_AVP_copy.png

NS_AVP_copy.png

3048 ms

cis_indiana_.png

cis_indiana_.png

3047 ms

pexels_photo_316466.jpeg

pexels_photo_316466.jpeg

3067 ms

tweed_2X.png

tweed_2X.png

3216 ms

divi_landing_demos_fan.png

divi_landing_demos_fan.png

3273 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

3114 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

13745 ms

css

css

29 ms

css

css

46 ms

css

css

49 ms

0.gif

0.gif

136 ms

font

font

15 ms

font

font

20 ms

font

font

25 ms

Accessibility Review

downeydesign.net accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

downeydesign.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

downeydesign.net SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Downeydesign.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Downeydesign.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

downeydesign.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Downey Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: