Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

downside.co.uk

Downside School | An Independent School Near Bath

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

723 ms

downside.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Downside content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about downside.co.uk

Downside School is an independent boarding and day school near Bath for girls and boys aged 11-18.

Visit downside.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Downside.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

downside.co.uk performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.downside.co.uk

2033 ms

278a650ea1.css

86 ms

jquery-3.6.3.min.js

34 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

30 ms

styles.css

183 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Downside.co.uk, 15% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 12% (4 requests) were made to Ka-p.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Downside.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.8 kB (11%)

Content Size

805.9 kB

After Optimization

718.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Downside.co.uk main page is 805.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 466.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 84.9 kB

  • Original 105.7 kB
  • After minification 104.3 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 466.8 kB
  • After minification 464.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Downside images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 37 B

  • Original 12.2 kB
  • After minification 12.2 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 211 B

  • Original 221.2 kB
  • After minification 221.2 kB
  • After compression 221.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Downside.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (55%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Downside. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

downside.co.uk accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

downside.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

downside.co.uk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Downside.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Downside.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Downside. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: