Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

downtimeclaims.com

Downtime Claims | Eckert & Associates, P.A. | Trucking Lawyers

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

354 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

downtimeclaims.com screenshot

About Website

Visit downtimeclaims.com now to see the best up-to-date Downtime Claims content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about downtimeclaims.com

The trucking lawyers of Eckert & Associates, P.A. aggressively pursue and collect downtime claims for owner-operators and fleets, as well as subrogation matters.

Visit downtimeclaims.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Downtimeclaims.com page load time and found that the first response time was 354 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

downtimeclaims.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.downtimeclaims.com

354 ms

wpapp-styles.css

31 ms

dashicons.min.css

35 ms

style.min.css

117 ms

theme.min.css

261 ms

Our browser made a total of 123 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Downtimeclaims.com, 23% (28 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (444 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 228.1 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Downtimeclaims.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 228.1 kB

  • Original 285.3 kB
  • After minification 285.2 kB
  • After compression 57.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 228.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Downtime Claims images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 85 (89%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Downtime Claims. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

downtimeclaims.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

downtimeclaims.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

downtimeclaims.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Downtimeclaims.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Downtimeclaims.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Downtime Claims. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: