Tools & Wizards About Us
draft.dev screenshot

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

draft.dev

Technical Marketing Content for Software Startups | Draft.dev

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

122 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

614 ms

draft.dev screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Draft content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about draft.dev

We create blog posts and tutorials designed to reach software engineers, data engineers, and technical leaders.

Visit draft.dev

Key Findings

We analyzed Draft.dev page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

draft.dev performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.19

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

draft.dev

122 ms

draft.dev

330 ms

draft-dev.webflow.2f3e3d31c.css

25 ms

webfont.js

314 ms

js

100 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Draft.dev, 39% (16 requests) were made to Assets-global.website-files.com and 34% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (330 ms) belongs to the original domain Draft.dev.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 156.0 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Draft.dev main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 29.6 kB
  • After minification 29.6 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 132.4 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Draft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 531 B

  • Original 74.7 kB
  • After minification 74.7 kB
  • After compression 74.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 15.9 kB
  • After minification 15.9 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Draft.dev has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (28%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Draft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

draft.dev

draft.dev

122 ms

draft.dev

draft.dev

330 ms

draft-dev.webflow.2f3e3d31c.css

draft-dev.webflow.2f3e3d31c.css

25 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

314 ms

js

js

100 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

13 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.dc5e7f18c8.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.dc5e7f18c8.js

22 ms

webflow.454bbcaf4.js

webflow.454bbcaf4.js

28 ms

css

css

36 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

136 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

147 ms

6409dabde7fbd449d50ad2e9_draftdev-logosdraft%20(1040%20%C3%97%20280%20px)%20(2).png

6409dabde7fbd449d50ad2e9_draftdev-logosdraft%20(1040%20%C3%97%20280%20px)%20(2).png

73 ms

6066fbb471e8b72274020729_image04.png

6066fbb471e8b72274020729_image04.png

143 ms

60672c044b8b1cc29882e14c_image05.png

60672c044b8b1cc29882e14c_image05.png

186 ms

60672c048a7ce2d986d1ae3c_image09.png

60672c048a7ce2d986d1ae3c_image09.png

248 ms

609ee2397bb0f45cd72bfe21_success.svg

609ee2397bb0f45cd72bfe21_success.svg

172 ms

644022896a454730cc47116a_Screenshot%202023-04-19%20at%2012.17.41%20PM.png

644022896a454730cc47116a_Screenshot%202023-04-19%20at%2012.17.41%20PM.png

268 ms

61fd629b2ae1fa18b033833f_Rich%20Loft.jpeg

61fd629b2ae1fa18b033833f_Rich%20Loft.jpeg

211 ms

61654712cb704c98ac052a50_1605031282270.jpg

61654712cb704c98ac052a50_1605031282270.jpg

210 ms

60674757a1f1980cea974ea4_image13.jpeg

60674757a1f1980cea974ea4_image13.jpeg

222 ms

606749cfd400116bc6536743_image14.jpeg

606749cfd400116bc6536743_image14.jpeg

261 ms

606749cf4d44cc4faf699ed7_image11.jpeg

606749cf4d44cc4faf699ed7_image11.jpeg

275 ms

61a4d5c79d28a50597458779_Draft.dev%20-%20Earthly%20-%20Narrative%20Format.png

61a4d5c79d28a50597458779_Draft.dev%20-%20Earthly%20-%20Narrative%20Format.png

297 ms

60d24469c2cc1dddf872dcfa_1.png

60d24469c2cc1dddf872dcfa_1.png

254 ms

60d24469a17eb39df6ce77c5_2.png

60d24469a17eb39df6ce77c5_2.png

323 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtuZnIGaV2g.ttf

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtuZnIGaV2g.ttf

43 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQttRnIGaV2g.ttf

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQttRnIGaV2g.ttf

55 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtrhnIGaV2g.ttf

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtrhnIGaV2g.ttf

65 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtjhgIGaV2g.ttf

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtjhgIGaV2g.ttf

94 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtgFgIGaV2g.ttf

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtgFgIGaV2g.ttf

79 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

79 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

78 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

76 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

89 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

93 ms

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzro.ttf

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzro.ttf

93 ms

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy4.ttf

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy4.ttf

94 ms

EJRTQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFT_r21dw.ttf

EJRTQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFT_r21dw.ttf

103 ms

EJRQQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFT9gaQZynfpQ.ttf

EJRQQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFT9gaQZynfpQ.ttf

103 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

insight.old.min.js

insight.old.min.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

draft.dev accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

draft.dev best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

draft.dev SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Draft.dev can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Draft.dev main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

draft.dev

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Draft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: