1.8 sec in total
267 ms
1.1 sec
473 ms
Visit draftanalyzer.com now to see the best up-to-date Draft Analyzer content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about draftanalyzer.com
Draft Hero for Fantasy Football 2024
Visit draftanalyzer.comWe analyzed Draftanalyzer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
draftanalyzer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value5.0 s
76/100
10%
267 ms
88 ms
142 ms
229 ms
194 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Draftanalyzer.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (573 ms) relates to the external source Drafthero.com.
Page size can be reduced by 779.0 kB (34%)
2.3 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Draftanalyzer.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.0 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 743.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Draft Analyzer needs image optimization as it can save up to 743.0 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (34%)
44
29
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Draft Analyzer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
drafthero.com
267 ms
bootstrap.min.css
88 ms
magnific-popup.css
142 ms
materialdesignicons.min.css
229 ms
aos.css
194 ms
pe-icon-7.css
215 ms
owl.carousel.css
220 ms
owl.theme.css
222 ms
owl.transitions.css
214 ms
css.css
233 ms
style.css
254 ms
custom.css
255 ms
logo.webp
313 ms
logo-dark.webp
313 ms
home-desk.png
452 ms
Yahoo.webp
313 ms
ESPN.webp
314 ms
CBS.webp
313 ms
Sleeper.webp
314 ms
MFL.webp
322 ms
FFPC.webp
319 ms
NFFC.webp
333 ms
RTSports.webp
333 ms
jquery.min.js
388 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
361 ms
aos.js
362 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
374 ms
custom.js
373 ms
drafthero.signin.js
412 ms
features-1.png
520 ms
features-2.png
449 ms
features-3.png
491 ms
screenshot-1.png
507 ms
screenshot-2.png
549 ms
screenshot-3.png
488 ms
screenshot-4.png
568 ms
screenshot-5.png
573 ms
screenshot-6.png
524 ms
1.webp
416 ms
2.webp
375 ms
3.webp
382 ms
4.webp
384 ms
5.webp
393 ms
6.webp
394 ms
home-bg1.jpg
351 ms
materialdesignicons-webfont.woff
356 ms
draftanalyzer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
draftanalyzer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
draftanalyzer.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Draftanalyzer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Draftanalyzer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
draftanalyzer.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Draft Analyzer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: