Tools & Wizards About Us
drapefit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

drapefit.com

Drape Fit - Online Personal Stylist in USA | Online Styling Services | Clothes Delivery Monthly US

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

185 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

470 ms

drapefit.com screenshot

About Website

Visit drapefit.com now to see the best up-to-date Drape Fit content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about drapefit.com

Drape Fit is one of the best branded Online clothes store in USA. Which deals in Men, Women and Kids outfits. Choose your own style outfit and get free shipping. Shop Now.

Visit drapefit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Drapefit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

drapefit.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value32.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.8 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,520 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.24

52/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

drapefit.com

185 ms

www.drapefit.com

239 ms

www.drapefit.com

759 ms

font-awesome.min.css

29 ms

bootstrap.min.css

356 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Drapefit.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) belongs to the original domain Drapefit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 976.0 kB (19%)

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Drapefit.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 107.8 kB

  • Original 125.7 kB
  • After minification 87.6 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 38.1 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 3.8 MB
  • After minification 3.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Drape Fit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 452.4 kB

  • Original 643.7 kB
  • After minification 590.1 kB
  • After compression 191.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 452.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 408.5 kB

  • Original 448.9 kB
  • After minification 223.5 kB
  • After compression 40.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Drapefit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 408.5 kB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (50%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Drape Fit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

drapefit.com

drapefit.com

185 ms

www.drapefit.com

www.drapefit.com

239 ms

www.drapefit.com

www.drapefit.com

759 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

29 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

356 ms

style.css

style.css

416 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.css

bootstrap-datetimepicker.css

183 ms

style.css

style.css

299 ms

design.css

design.css

183 ms

responsive-accordion.css

responsive-accordion.css

232 ms

kidstyle.css

kidstyle.css

301 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

241 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

290 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

424 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

29 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

350 ms

moment-with-locales.js

moment-with-locales.js

473 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.js

bootstrap-datetimepicker.js

473 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

409 ms

js

js

72 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

28 ms

additional-methods.min.js

additional-methods.min.js

30 ms

classic-10_7.css

classic-10_7.css

18 ms

mc-validate.js

mc-validate.js

47 ms

css2

css2

29 ms

css2

css2

70 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

97 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

64 ms

logo.png

logo.png

96 ms

menu-toggle.png

menu-toggle.png

96 ms

widget_loader.gif

widget_loader.gif

97 ms

holiday-offer.jpg

holiday-offer.jpg

219 ms

banner8.jpg

banner8.jpg

220 ms

banner10.jpg

banner10.jpg

613 ms

banner6.jpg

banner6.jpg

436 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

396 ms

header-booten.png

header-booten.png

149 ms

Men9.jpg

Men9.jpg

221 ms

Women13.jpg

Women13.jpg

375 ms

Kids7.jpg

Kids7.jpg

375 ms

leady.jpg

leady.jpg

375 ms

box1.jpg

box1.jpg

403 ms

boxdouble.jpg

boxdouble.jpg

403 ms

howwediffer.jpg

howwediffer.jpg

406 ms

Women14.jpg

Women14.jpg

459 ms

Men15.jpg

Men15.jpg

460 ms

Kids8.jpg

Kids8.jpg

459 ms

Women9.jpg

Women9.jpg

460 ms

js

js

105 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

99 ms

HVDFontsBrandonTextRegular.woff

HVDFontsBrandonTextRegular.woff

441 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

78 ms

shado.png

shado.png

364 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

387 ms

destination

destination

165 ms

bat.js

bat.js

181 ms

9q1jr35rse

9q1jr35rse

191 ms

us.png

us.png

314 ms

HVDFontsBrandonTextLight.woff

HVDFontsBrandonTextLight.woff

312 ms

HVDFontsBrandonTextBold.woff

HVDFontsBrandonTextBold.woff

347 ms

collect

collect

67 ms

collect

collect

68 ms

AmazonUIFont-amazonember_bd-b605252f87b8b3df5ae206596dac0938fc5888bc._V2_.woff

AmazonUIFont-amazonember_bd-b605252f87b8b3df5ae206596dac0938fc5888bc._V2_.woff

36 ms

AmazonUIFont-amazonember_rg-8a9db402d8966ae93717c348b9ab0bd08703a7a7._V2_.woff

AmazonUIFont-amazonember_rg-8a9db402d8966ae93717c348b9ab0bd08703a7a7._V2_.woff

57 ms

56349125.js

56349125.js

34 ms

collect

collect

55 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

27 ms

collect

collect

62 ms

js

js

65 ms

56349125

56349125

54 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

47 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

61 ms

c.gif

c.gif

10 ms

Accessibility Review

drapefit.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

drapefit.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

drapefit.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Drapefit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Drapefit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

drapefit.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Drape Fit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: