Tools & Wizards About Us
driveway.ai screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

driveway.ai

Data-Driven Insurance Telematics Solutions | Earnix

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

595 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

102 ms

driveway.ai screenshot

About Website

Visit driveway.ai now to see the best up-to-date Driveway content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about driveway.ai

Our data-driven and usage-based insurance telematics solutions deliver key insights from behavior, leading to more personalized insurance offers. Learn more.

Visit driveway.ai

Key Findings

We analyzed Driveway.ai page load time and found that the first response time was 595 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Driveway.ai rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

driveway.ai performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.111

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

driveway.ai

595 ms

legacy.js

51 ms

modern.js

58 ms

extract-css-runtime-16c1f421777033c77e1f7-min.en-US.js

209 ms

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-98bddc81dc37f44faa7b2-min.en-US.js

223 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Driveway.ai, 93% (14 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Assets.squarespace.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.7 kB (3%)

Content Size

136.4 kB

After Optimization

131.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Driveway.ai main page is 136.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 104.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 5.5 kB
  • After minification 5.5 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 589 B

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Driveway needs image optimization as it can save up to 589 B or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 396 B

  • Original 24.4 kB
  • After minification 24.4 kB
  • After compression 24.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 14 B

  • Original 104.3 kB
  • After minification 104.3 kB
  • After compression 104.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Driveway.ai has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (64%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Driveway. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

driveway.ai

driveway.ai

595 ms

legacy.js

legacy.js

51 ms

modern.js

modern.js

58 ms

extract-css-runtime-16c1f421777033c77e1f7-min.en-US.js

extract-css-runtime-16c1f421777033c77e1f7-min.en-US.js

209 ms

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-98bddc81dc37f44faa7b2-min.en-US.js

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-98bddc81dc37f44faa7b2-min.en-US.js

223 ms

cldr-resource-pack-e00320a476a8814af38d4-min.en-US.js

cldr-resource-pack-e00320a476a8814af38d4-min.en-US.js

261 ms

common-vendors-stable-a30753685e88d3c1847ad-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-stable-a30753685e88d3c1847ad-min.en-US.js

272 ms

common-vendors-6f5bde26f95b0d6d5e036-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-6f5bde26f95b0d6d5e036-min.en-US.js

270 ms

common-1003ffa4355d8bb7ac558-min.en-US.js

common-1003ffa4355d8bb7ac558-min.en-US.js

330 ms

common-16a9b54d179f469ec5631-min.en-US.css

common-16a9b54d179f469ec5631-min.en-US.css

325 ms

dialog-53e397bdde15255be0987-min.en-US.js

dialog-53e397bdde15255be0987-min.en-US.js

328 ms

dialog-89b254b5c87045b9e1360-min.en-US.css

dialog-89b254b5c87045b9e1360-min.en-US.css

328 ms

system-page-97ecf81ac1f17f511f211-min.en-US.js

system-page-97ecf81ac1f17f511f211-min.en-US.js

965 ms

system-page-da68cbe1026262605dd01-min.en-US.css

system-page-da68cbe1026262605dd01-min.en-US.css

1021 ms

logomark-dark.png

logomark-dark.png

38 ms

Accessibility Review

driveway.ai accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

driveway.ai best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

driveway.ai SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Driveway.ai can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Driveway.ai main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

driveway.ai

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Driveway. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: