Tools & Wizards About Us
drucker-test.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

drucker-test.eu

Die 6 Besten Drucker [Ratgeber] 2024 - technikblog.net

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

510 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

920 ms

drucker-test.eu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to drucker-test.eu homepage info - get ready to check Drucker Test best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about drucker-test.eu

Drucker Test und Vergleich ✓ Neue Drucker Modelle ✓ Multifunktionsdrucker ✓Tintenstrahldrucker ✓ Farblaserdrucker ✓ Drucker im Test by technikblog.net

Visit drucker-test.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Drucker-test.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 510 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

drucker-test.eu performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.068

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

drucker-test.eu

510 ms

613 ms

style.min.css

102 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

198 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

288 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Drucker-test.eu, 69% (43 requests) were made to Technikblog.net and 19% (12 requests) were made to M.media-amazon.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (746 ms) relates to the external source Technikblog.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 167.7 kB (25%)

Content Size

674.8 kB

After Optimization

507.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Drucker-test.eu main page is 674.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 260.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 163.8 kB

  • Original 192.5 kB
  • After minification 177.6 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 163.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 98 B

  • Original 260.9 kB
  • After minification 260.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Drucker Test images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 596 B

  • Original 122.1 kB
  • After minification 122.1 kB
  • After compression 121.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 99.4 kB
  • After minification 99.4 kB
  • After compression 96.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Drucker-test.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (53%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Drucker Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

drucker-test.eu

drucker-test.eu

510 ms

613 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

102 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

198 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

288 ms

styles.css

styles.css

289 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

290 ms

wordpress-svg-icon-plugin-style.min.css

wordpress-svg-icon-plugin-style.min.css

292 ms

screen.min.css

screen.min.css

292 ms

ez-toc-sticky.min.css

ez-toc-sticky.min.css

294 ms

style.css

style.css

483 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

389 ms

font.css

font.css

390 ms

main.css

main.css

392 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

487 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

391 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

506 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

587 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

508 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

506 ms

icons.css

icons.css

578 ms

index.js

index.js

580 ms

index.js

index.js

579 ms

smooth_scroll.min.js

smooth_scroll.min.js

717 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

717 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

743 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

743 ms

ez-toc-sticky.min.js

ez-toc-sticky.min.js

743 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

746 ms

e-202426.js

e-202426.js

11 ms

main.js

main.js

742 ms

snippet.min.js

snippet.min.js

742 ms

21q-QI9rZQL._SL160_.jpg

21q-QI9rZQL._SL160_.jpg

136 ms

438 ms

31WSX-o5U4L._SL160_.jpg

31WSX-o5U4L._SL160_.jpg

165 ms

31ICbIf0UuL._SL160_.jpg

31ICbIf0UuL._SL160_.jpg

169 ms

41nDVLXc1jL._SL160_.jpg

41nDVLXc1jL._SL160_.jpg

170 ms

31YLyaxv-UL._SL160_.jpg

31YLyaxv-UL._SL160_.jpg

174 ms

41Ot+gIaCJL._SL160_.jpg

41Ot+gIaCJL._SL160_.jpg

176 ms

31WwaQl1o4L._SL160_.jpg

31WwaQl1o4L._SL160_.jpg

174 ms

41G7Ln+QykL._SL160_.jpg

41G7Ln+QykL._SL160_.jpg

169 ms

31PYbCQt+RL._SL160_.jpg

31PYbCQt+RL._SL160_.jpg

178 ms

31N1P15g+6L._SL160_.jpg

31N1P15g+6L._SL160_.jpg

175 ms

21sK86lmY2L._SL160_.jpg

21sK86lmY2L._SL160_.jpg

176 ms

41wXo+uuCNL._SL160_.jpg

41wXo+uuCNL._SL160_.jpg

175 ms

cropped-technikblog_net_-1-1.png

cropped-technikblog_net_-1-1.png

182 ms

HP_Officejet_Pro_6230_Bild1-1-1024x576.jpg

HP_Officejet_Pro_6230_Bild1-1-1024x576.jpg

281 ms

HP-Officejet-Pro-6970-1-1024x768.jpg

HP-Officejet-Pro-6970-1-1024x768.jpg

374 ms

icon-check-prime.svg

icon-check-prime.svg

184 ms

icon-cart-white.svg

icon-cart-white.svg

182 ms

HP-Officejet-Pro-6970-1-150x150.jpg

HP-Officejet-Pro-6970-1-150x150.jpg

183 ms

HP_Officejet_Pro_6230_Bild1-1-150x150.jpg

HP_Officejet_Pro_6230_Bild1-1-150x150.jpg

279 ms

dell-c2665dnf-netzwerkfaehiger-multifunktions-farblaserdrucker-mit-duplexfunktion-scanner-kopierer-drucker-fax-1-150x150.jpg

dell-c2665dnf-netzwerkfaehiger-multifunktions-farblaserdrucker-mit-duplexfunktion-scanner-kopierer-drucker-fax-1-150x150.jpg

279 ms

hp-officejet-pro-6230-etintenstrahldrucker-a4-drucker-usb-2-0-ethernet-wifi-600-x-1200-schwarz-1-300x167.jpg

hp-officejet-pro-6230-etintenstrahldrucker-a4-drucker-usb-2-0-ethernet-wifi-600-x-1200-schwarz-1-300x167.jpg

280 ms

dell-c2665dnf-netzwerkfaehiger-multifunktions-farblaserdrucker-mit-duplexfunktion-scanner-kopierer-drucker-fax-1-259x300.jpg

dell-c2665dnf-netzwerkfaehiger-multifunktions-farblaserdrucker-mit-duplexfunktion-scanner-kopierer-drucker-fax-1-259x300.jpg

280 ms

style-noise.png

style-noise.png

290 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

480 ms

forkawesome-webfont.woff

forkawesome-webfont.woff

451 ms

43 ms

50 ms

49 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

97 ms

Accessibility Review

drucker-test.eu accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

drucker-test.eu best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

drucker-test.eu SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Drucker-test.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Drucker-test.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

drucker-test.eu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Drucker Test. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: