Tools & Wizards About Us
dslanbietervergleich.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

dslanbietervergleich.net

DSL Anbieter Vergleich - Angebote & Tarife jetzt vergleichen!

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

372 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

601 ms

dslanbietervergleich.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dslanbietervergleich.net homepage info - get ready to check DSL Anbieter Vergleich best content right away, or after learning these important things about dslanbietervergleich.net

Aktueller DSL Anbieter Vergleich der besten Angebote und Tarife für Ihren DSL Anschluss - Anbieter Details zur Telekom, O2, 1 und 1 sowie Vodafone etc.

Visit dslanbietervergleich.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Dslanbietervergleich.net page load time and found that the first response time was 372 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dslanbietervergleich.net performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.446

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.dslanbietervergleich.net

372 ms

jquery.min.js

241 ms

plugin.css

217 ms

datatables.css

292 ms

reset.css

296 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Dslanbietervergleich.net, 27% (13 requests) were made to Tools.communicationads.net and 10% (5 requests) were made to Bilder.communicationads.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Dslanbietervergleich.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 241.4 kB (60%)

Content Size

400.9 kB

After Optimization

159.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dslanbietervergleich.net main page is 400.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 274.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 24.8 kB
  • After minification 23.5 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.9 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 74.0 kB
  • After minification 61.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, DSL Anbieter Vergleich needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 187.6 kB

  • Original 274.4 kB
  • After minification 273.5 kB
  • After compression 86.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.6 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 23.6 kB

  • Original 27.7 kB
  • After minification 24.7 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dslanbietervergleich.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (67%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DSL Anbieter Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.dslanbietervergleich.net

www.dslanbietervergleich.net

372 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

241 ms

plugin.css

plugin.css

217 ms

datatables.css

datatables.css

292 ms

reset.css

reset.css

296 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

275 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

297 ms

style.css

style.css

401 ms

vt-base.css

vt-base.css

400 ms

vt-skin-black.css

vt-skin-black.css

403 ms

css3_table_style.css

css3_table_style.css

402 ms

modernizr-1.7.min

modernizr-1.7.min

1101 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

421 ms

1621cc940b75367f40dc209bcc09df7f.js

1621cc940b75367f40dc209bcc09df7f.js

609 ms

css

css

30 ms

pattern01.png

pattern01.png

201 ms

body-grad.png

body-grad.png

204 ms

bg-top-nav.gif

bg-top-nav.gif

200 ms

ad-frame.gif

ad-frame.gif

205 ms

bg-nav.gif

bg-nav.gif

311 ms

bg-nav-div.gif

bg-nav-div.gif

312 ms

shadow.png

shadow.png

315 ms

bg-heading.gif

bg-heading.gif

317 ms

arrow.gif

arrow.gif

320 ms

head.png

head.png

405 ms

logo.jpeg

logo.jpeg

408 ms

Internetanschluss.jpg

Internetanschluss.jpg

407 ms

calc.php

calc.php

799 ms

ca_shipping_style_v2_new_tpl.php

ca_shipping_style_v2_new_tpl.php

368 ms

select2.css

select2.css

283 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

37 ms

jquery.fa_qtip.css

jquery.fa_qtip.css

192 ms

1245.png

1245.png

493 ms

1116.png

1116.png

588 ms

1029.png

1029.png

557 ms

1246.png

1246.png

471 ms

1228.png

1228.png

488 ms

caret_down.png

caret_down.png

94 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

15 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

183 ms

jquery.ba-resize.min.js

jquery.ba-resize.min.js

98 ms

jquery.chained.min.js

jquery.chained.min.js

94 ms

jquery.fa_qtip2.js

jquery.fa_qtip2.js

360 ms

fa_starrating_layer2.js

fa_starrating_layer2.js

192 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

283 ms

boxover.js

boxover.js

192 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

287 ms

ca_calc_iframe.js

ca_calc_iframe.js

274 ms

ca_calc.js

ca_calc.js

276 ms

Accessibility Review

dslanbietervergleich.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

dslanbietervergleich.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

dslanbietervergleich.net SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dslanbietervergleich.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Dslanbietervergleich.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dslanbietervergleich.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of DSL Anbieter Vergleich. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: