Tools & Wizards About Us
dsmithstudio.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

dsmithstudio.com

Duncan Smith

Page Load Speed

693 ms in total

First Response

74 ms

Resources Loaded

571 ms

Page Rendered

48 ms

dsmithstudio.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dsmithstudio.com homepage info - get ready to check D Smith Studio best content right away, or after learning these important things about dsmithstudio.com

Visit dsmithstudio.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dsmithstudio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 74 ms and then it took 619 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dsmithstudio.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value850 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.dsmithstudio.com

74 ms

css2

74 ms

legacy.js

56 ms

modern.js

61 ms

extract-css-runtime-ee9a7b7384ee1f3be597-min.en-US.js

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Dsmithstudio.com, 53% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com and 18% (3 requests) were made to Static1.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (290 ms) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (29%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dsmithstudio.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 59.1 kB

  • Original 72.3 kB
  • After minification 65.9 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. D Smith Studio images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB
  • After compression 975.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 19.2 kB
  • After minification 19.2 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dsmithstudio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (56%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of D Smith Studio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.dsmithstudio.com

www.dsmithstudio.com

74 ms

css2

css2

74 ms

legacy.js

legacy.js

56 ms

modern.js

modern.js

61 ms

extract-css-runtime-ee9a7b7384ee1f3be597-min.en-US.js

extract-css-runtime-ee9a7b7384ee1f3be597-min.en-US.js

55 ms

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js

78 ms

cldr-resource-pack-4b37eb27c737844571ba-min.en-US.js

cldr-resource-pack-4b37eb27c737844571ba-min.en-US.js

58 ms

common-vendors-stable-b03dd66b7c78e5e40bc7-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-stable-b03dd66b7c78e5e40bc7-min.en-US.js

69 ms

common-vendors-0f1aafef58bd79a845d5-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-0f1aafef58bd79a845d5-min.en-US.js

132 ms

common-3e11c02616f9b1722f69-min.en-US.js

common-3e11c02616f9b1722f69-min.en-US.js

133 ms

performance-74d24f5c2adcf3b8ee8a-min.en-US.js

performance-74d24f5c2adcf3b8ee8a-min.en-US.js

62 ms

site.css

site.css

77 ms

static.css

static.css

57 ms

site-bundle.11fff701a22dbd232e9127391845b3e2.js

site-bundle.11fff701a22dbd232e9127391845b3e2.js

62 ms

B12I2987.jpg

B12I2987.jpg

290 ms

B12I9521.jpg

B12I9521.jpg

268 ms

Ollie+Head+Shot-487.jpg

Ollie+Head+Shot-487.jpg

251 ms

Accessibility Review

dsmithstudio.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best Practices

dsmithstudio.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

dsmithstudio.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dsmithstudio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dsmithstudio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dsmithstudio.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of D Smith Studio. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: