4.7 sec in total
297 ms
3.9 sec
530 ms
Visit duckback.in now to see the best up-to-date Duckback content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about duckback.in
known for quality ,promt supplies ,corporate enquries ,duckback leading dealers ,duckback supplier ,duckback showroom
Visit duckback.inWe analyzed Duckback.in page load time and found that the first response time was 297 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
duckback.in performance score
297 ms
2036 ms
58 ms
72 ms
84 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Duckback.in, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Duckback.in.
Page size can be reduced by 673.1 kB (26%)
2.6 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Duckback.in main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 126.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Duckback images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 235.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 235.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 299.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Duckback.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 299.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (49%)
37
19
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Duckback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
duckback.in
297 ms
www.duckback.in
2036 ms
css
58 ms
css
72 ms
css
84 ms
css
87 ms
font-awesome.css
285 ms
lazy-load.css
193 ms
main-style.css
488 ms
bootstrap.css
580 ms
custom.css
306 ms
jquery11.min.js
511 ms
bootstrap.js
610 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
479 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
540 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
778 ms
cherry.lazy-load.js
524 ms
device.min.js
534 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
552 ms
jquery.simplr.smoothscroll.min.js
588 ms
parallaxSlider.js
596 ms
ga.js
64 ms
bg_1.jpg
102 ms
header-bg.png
105 ms
logo1.png
99 ms
versalis-logo.png
105 ms
duckback-logo.png
726 ms
ad-banner.jpg
100 ms
icon1.png
209 ms
arrowbuttonbg.png
213 ms
icon2.png
206 ms
icon3.png
212 ms
recent-projects-bg.jpg
536 ms
proimg1.jpg
321 ms
proimg2.jpg
398 ms
proimg3.jpg
311 ms
1-new.jpg
424 ms
footer-bg.jpg
521 ms
caption.png
369 ms
spinner.GIF
450 ms
slide_1.jpg
683 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
475 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
730 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
duckback.in SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Duckback.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Duckback.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
duckback.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Duckback. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: