Tools & Wizards About Us
duplicatefilter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

duplicatefilter.com

Duplicate Filter -- Free Software to Find and Remove Duplicate Files

Page Load Speed

888 ms in total

First Response

151 ms

Resources Loaded

568 ms

Page Rendered

169 ms

duplicatefilter.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Duplicate Filter content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about duplicatefilter.com

Duplicate Filter can instantly find, compare and manage duplicate files in your computer and neighborhood computers. You can rename, move or remove duplicates after finding duplicate mp3 music, songs,...

Visit duplicatefilter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Duplicatefilter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 151 ms and then it took 737 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

duplicatefilter.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

duplicatefilter.com

151 ms

reset.css

45 ms

style1.css

75 ms

menu_top.css

45 ms

menu_bottom.css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Duplicatefilter.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Web.chat4support.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Srv.chat4support.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (186 ms) relates to the external source Srv.chat4support.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 127.0 kB (55%)

Content Size

230.2 kB

After Optimization

103.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Duplicatefilter.com main page is 230.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 136.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 26.3 kB

  • Original 31.8 kB
  • After minification 20.8 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 47.7 kB

  • Original 136.1 kB
  • After minification 88.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Duplicate Filter needs image optimization as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 46.2 kB

  • Original 53.1 kB
  • After minification 38.5 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 9.1 kB
  • After minification 7.3 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Duplicatefilter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (68%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Duplicate Filter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

duplicatefilter.com

duplicatefilter.com

151 ms

reset.css

reset.css

45 ms

style1.css

style1.css

75 ms

menu_top.css

menu_top.css

45 ms

menu_bottom.css

menu_bottom.css

44 ms

home_icon-trans.png

home_icon-trans.png

59 ms

products_icon-trans.png

products_icon-trans.png

66 ms

download_icon-trans.png

download_icon-trans.png

65 ms

products_icon-screen.png

products_icon-screen.png

130 ms

cart_icon-trans.png

cart_icon-trans.png

80 ms

help_icon-trans.png

help_icon-trans.png

89 ms

contact_icon-trans.png

contact_icon-trans.png

88 ms

sitemap_icon-trans.png

sitemap_icon-trans.png

88 ms

df_products.jpg

df_products.jpg

131 ms

Nav.jpg

Nav.jpg

87 ms

home-office.png

home-office.png

133 ms

go.png

go.png

133 ms

New.jpg

New.jpg

90 ms

network-globe.png

network-globe.png

91 ms

banner.aspx

banner.aspx

156 ms

body_bg.png

body_bg.png

74 ms

box_orange_bottom.png

box_orange_bottom.png

75 ms

box_orange_bg.png

box_orange_bg.png

76 ms

box_orange_top.png

box_orange_top.png

95 ms

box_blue_bottom.png

box_blue_bottom.png

94 ms

box_blue_bg.png

box_blue_bg.png

96 ms

box_blue_top.png

box_blue_top.png

97 ms

disc.jpg

disc.jpg

115 ms

bottom_bg.png

bottom_bg.png

116 ms

banner.js

banner.js

66 ms

visit.asp

visit.asp

186 ms

bannerclose.gif

bannerclose.gif

25 ms

Accessibility Review

duplicatefilter.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

duplicatefilter.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

duplicatefilter.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Duplicatefilter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Duplicatefilter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

duplicatefilter.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Duplicate Filter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: