1.2 sec in total
42 ms
840 ms
286 ms
Visit duplicatesweeper.com now to see the best up-to-date Duplicate Sweeper content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about duplicatesweeper.com
Find and remove duplicate files on your PC or Mac. Duplicate Sweeper can delete duplicate files, photos, music and more.
Visit duplicatesweeper.comWe analyzed Duplicatesweeper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
duplicatesweeper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value3.2 s
74/100
25%
Value2.9 s
94/100
10%
Value850 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value8.4 s
39/100
10%
42 ms
22 ms
253 ms
69 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Duplicatesweeper.com, 96% (49 requests) were made to Wideanglesoftware.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (416 ms) relates to the external source Wideanglesoftware.com.
Page size can be reduced by 44.4 kB (7%)
604.3 kB
559.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Duplicatesweeper.com main page is 604.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 541.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.0 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Duplicate Sweeper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Duplicatesweeper.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (11%)
45
40
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Duplicate Sweeper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
duplicatesweeper.com
42 ms
22 ms
253 ms
was-main-min.css
69 ms
jquery.3.6.0.min.js
41 ms
gtm.js
91 ms
logo_ns2.png
22 ms
64_droidtransfer.png
23 ms
64_touchcopy_new_mac.png
24 ms
64_tunesweeper.png
28 ms
64_ibackupextractormac3.png
29 ms
64_musictag.png
26 ms
64_pdfconverter.png
31 ms
64_duplicatesweeper.png
34 ms
64_contacttransfer.png
33 ms
64_waveform.png
39 ms
64_ailocalizer.png
42 ms
sidebar_new_m.gif
37 ms
basket.png
53 ms
h2_duplicatesweeper_title.gif
56 ms
windows-11-white.svg
52 ms
white-shopping-cart.png
53 ms
ds_searchresults-mobile.png
311 ms
computer.png
55 ms
file.png
89 ms
file-camera.png
88 ms
file-camera3.png
86 ms
file-camera2.png
86 ms
bin2.png
86 ms
photos-icon.png
89 ms
files-icon.png
90 ms
music-icon.png
90 ms
video-computer-screen2.jpg
91 ms
delete-duplicate-photos.jpg
416 ms
youtube-play.png
93 ms
automatically-delete-duplicate-files.jpg
338 ms
microsoft-store-large.png
92 ms
duplicate-photo-finder.png
96 ms
duplicate-photo-remover.png
255 ms
duplicate-file-finder.jpg
96 ms
delete-duplicate-songs.png
115 ms
Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff
110 ms
Roboto-Light-webfont.woff
102 ms
Roboto-Bold-webfont.woff
106 ms
4stars.jpg
111 ms
stars.jpg
127 ms
x-circle-icon.png
127 ms
facebook_circle_icon.png
129 ms
instagram_circle_icon.png
129 ms
youtube_circle_icon.png
137 ms
linkedin_circle_icon.png
134 ms
duplicatesweeper.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
duplicatesweeper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
duplicatesweeper.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Duplicatesweeper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Duplicatesweeper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
duplicatesweeper.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Duplicate Sweeper. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: